• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Joe Rogan can fuck right off for all the reasons. But first let’s jam some dirty gym socks in his mouth to shut him the fuck up.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Roughly quoting Jay Mohr from his recent interview on Bobby Lee’s Tigerbelly podcast:

      "How Joe Rogan became the arbiter of what is funny is beyond me… all the times Joe Rogan has made us laugh… "

      Joe Rogan has gotta be one of the least funny “comedians” in the game at the moment. I wish his relevancy would’ve peaked with Fear Factor.

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t really hear about Rogan very often any more. Thank Buddha. But it blows my mind that he’s still super popular. The average person sucks.

    • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I only really knew one of his stand up routines and thought it was alright for what it was. I learned about his podcast and that it was supposedly good, but i had no way of listening to it. Then it was on Spotify and i listened to the bob lazar episode and ho-ly, no idea how he ever got popular AT ALL. I have more understanding for people who listen to Ben Shapiro

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    Rogan’s entire career was predicated on the normalisation of reactionary right-wing beliefs/prejudices. He was the motte to the bailey of the Thiels and Bannons, easing perfectly normal dudes along the path, one casual joke at the expense of minorities at a time. And for a while it worked, to the point where Spotify bet the company on him. And then, the word “weird” entered the discourse, and people realised that casual cruelty and obsessing about strangers’ genitals weren’t the time-honoured values of a silent majority.

    It would suck to be holding Spotify shares right now.

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They gave him another stand up special? I haven’t seen the new one but his old standup is awful. Seriously some of the most unfunny shit ever from an established television personality.

  • orcrist@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    We don’t need to care about him. Bad comedians with shitty world views are a dime a dozen. He’s famous because he communicates well and not because his ideas are worth attention or respect.

  • Shaleesh [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s so crazy how this show is basically the exact same shit the exact same type of guy would have done 10, 20, 30 years ago with the exact same jokes. The only difference is the post-covid brainworms and the context of the transphobia being presented as a losing ideology. Kinda mindblowing that this dude is a couple years from AARP eligibility and still talking like he’s in middle school. That sucks.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    I noticed him on my Netflix just now.

    Thumbs downed the lot on principle. I ain’t watching that shit.

  • SpicyLizards@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s not a weird competition!

    Everyone can be weird in their own way… just some should never be in charge of anything ever…

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Using “weird” about a comedian actually risks the whole gambit IMO. You start calling everyone weird, maybe it’s just you who is the unusual person calling everyone who disagrees with you weird.

      The whole point of the attack is that the weird people are not acceptable elected officials. Keep it to people who are trying to get elected.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Imo it isn’t great anyway. I’m fucking weird, and I’ve been working my whole life to turn “weird” into a good thing rather than something for 90s bullies to use to call you retarded (along with retarded itself). In 6mo “weird” is going to be synonymous with “nazi.” Austin TX is gonna have to change their slogan lol.

      • kevlar21@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think the distinction is hoping someone will do something vs saying we should do something. That’s the “advocating” part. Nobody can say that a comment hoping Rogan would jump off a cliff had anything to do with it if it actually happens somehow.

      • CTDummy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t think either is acceptable frankly but my guess is this is a passive statement “I hope they do x”. Yours is advocating for direct violence “we should shoot/kill x”. Both are shitty and should be avoided imo but one is a call to action.

      • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You know who always gets caught with kiddie porn on their computers? People like you who constantly want draconic punishments for those they cannot even differentiate from actual child rapists. So, what are you hiding?

          • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            What in the hell about my comment is rage bait? lol Over the years we’ve had countless of news articles about priests, pedo hunters and other highly “outspoken” individuals getting caught with child pornography or a history of raping children. It’s always the same pattern.

            Death penalty = barbarism. Murder is only okay if there’s no other option, like a trapped you vs me scenario, or a violent dictator like Hitler who can’t be removed through other means, etc. And I already live in a civilized country so it already is abolished.

          • Zozano@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I don’t think there’s an ethical basis for capital punishment, except under some extreme circumstance (like having intel that a militant force will raid a prison to rescue a high ranking war criminal).

            There are multiple reasons:

            1. Surprisingly, capital punishment is expensive. So expensive in fact, that it’s cheaper to keep them in prison for their entire life, multiple times over.

            2. The capacity for someone to suffer ends when they die. If you believe in punishment (I don’t, but you do you), then it makes sense to prolong their suffering as long as possible.

            3. Capital punishment doesn’t dissuade criminals. Countries with capital punishment have just as many criminals as those without.

            4. Punishment is a shitty metric by all accounts. Harm mitigation is the aim of the game, whether you’re talking about prison or execution, they’re both isolating a person from the broader community. If the prison serves the same purpose, why do we need execution?

            5. It’s unrealistic to employ capital punishment where there isn’t any. Anyone who deserves to be executed would not be released from prison. You’ve got a better chance of convincing people to prolong prison punishments than you do of instating legal murder.

            6. Innocent people are wrongfully convinced every day. Many people have been executed, only to be found innocent some years later.

          • Zozano@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            What the other poster was getting at, which I was going to bring up is they said there’s a difference between a paedophile and a child molester.

            A child molester is a criminal, a paedophile is not.

            Don’t get the wrong idea, this isn’t a defence of paedophiles, but defence of a demographic of people who haven’t done anything wrong.

            Much of the reason paedophiles dont seek help is because of the mindset displayed here.

            A paedophile who commits themselves to never touching a child is nothing short of a hero in my opinion.