• someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I read about the Antarctic. They keep running into walls of ice before they could find/see it.

    • criitz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Actually no, I don’t think there were any people living in Antarctica… but I could be wrong.

      • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is a very human centric definition of discovery.

        Penguins has been living there for millenia beforehand.

          • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I was mocking the attitude that something can’t be discovered by one group of people if a different group of people already knew about it.

            Columbus discovering the Americas is commonly called a “euro-centric definition of discovery”. While conveniently ignoring that literally nobody in Europe knew the Americas existed.

      • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        But were there people living in the southern hemisphere who knew not to go further south because they’d reach the icy land of certain death?

        • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          There were probably people who knew that if they went further south they’d not come back. On maps locations like these used to be labeled “Here there be monsters” or something like that.

  • Guilvareux@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t know about you, but I find seeing things to be much easier when there isn’t a planet obscuring it.

  • Anh Kagi@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Well, we currently know better the moon’s surface than our oceans’ bottom, so…

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    If our main sensory organs were sound-based or feel-based, we’d probably have discovered a lot of things before planets and stars.

    The things that took a while to discover on earth, or that aren’t yet fully explored, are largely because it’s hard to see them without getting very close, which can be hard.

    Building a good telescope might have been hard, but with a telescope you can see things that are millions of km away. But, because of the earth’s curvature, you can’t see Antarctica until you’re practically next to Antarctica. You can’t see the bottom of the ocean until you travel to the bottom of the ocean, or at least until you scan it with sound waves which are then converted into something you can see.

    Imagine an alien that developed in the water on a planet with sub-surface oceans with ice on top. No real value for eyes, so they’re sound / touch based. Picture what it would be like to try to explore the solar system. There’s a boundary layer at the top of their “atmosphere” (the top of the ocean) that’s solid (ice), beyond that there’s some non-liquid extremely sparse stuff, until some point where no sound travels at all and there’s nothing to touch.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Reminds me of Rocky from Project Hail Mary (sort of, they didn’t live under ocean but under an extremely hostile-to-us atmosphere).

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I assure you that Uranus has been observed many times by many people dating far back into the past, such as by Hipparchos in 2nd Century BC. They conclusively figured out exactly what it was in 1846.