• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s kind of wild that the game went from being 4 months away, to a year away, to cancelled. I was very willing to believe they just needed more time. I’m used to thinking that if a game is at the point where the studio is advertising it for release in a few months, it’s impossible that the project would get completely shitcanned. Why were they advertising it and putting up a steam store page if it was still so up in the air?

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    An entire simulated town that you interact with and take part in still sounds like a pretty fun idea. I know it’s not the same genre but I hope Streets of Fortuna can pull it off.

    • brsrklf@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Sims 3 tried to approximate that, though in reality Sims that you couldn’t see around at the moment had a very simple alternate simulation instead of the full sim for those you were watching.

      The illusion mostly worked and you technically had a full seamless small town you could visit and interact directly with.

      Sims 3 was also an unstable nightmare, but it was made for what is now 15-year-old hardware and, I assume, held together with shoestrings.

      They got rid of the seamless part in 4, instead splitting the world in tiny groups of a couple buildings each, meaning even EA probably thought the open town was too much trouble. Too bad because the separate blocks are a lot more boring too… Like most of the Sims 4 really.

  • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Is Paradox doing okay? They own several franchises I care quite deeply about so I certainly hope this is a good decision cut their losses and not deliver a dud and not cost cutting to shore up worsening finances

  • BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    I think sims player are desperate enough to have paid $ 80 for this game in pre-alpha.

    Just add mod support and release it unfinished. It’s Paradox - a triple A studio - it’s expected to be a buggy, unfinished mess.

    • Corroded@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      That’s kind of like Tiny Life. It is similar to the Sims but with retro graphics. Lots of people bought it as soon as it hit early access when a lot of core things were missing.

        • Corroded@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I mean you aren’t too far off. Honestly I wouldn’t mind it. I would rather have a feature rich simpler looking game than something that’s fancy and shallow.

          I’d be more than impressed by something just basically recreates the original Sims experience.

          • DarkThoughts@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s a meta joke, since PZ often is called “The Sims but with zombies”, due to the art style and flexible decorative options.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The game, which was first revealed in 2023, sounded impressive: it was designed to allow for the entire town to be simulated in real-time and have no loading screens.

    However, based on a forum post by Paradox’s deputy CEO Mattias Lilja, the game had some issues that may not have been easily fixable even with additional time for development.

    “A few weeks back, we decided to hold off on an Early Access release in order to re-evaluate Life by You, as we still felt that the game was lacking in some key areas,” Lilja says.

    “Though a time extension was an option, once we took that pause to get a wider view of the game, it became clear to us that the road leading to a release that we felt confident about was far too long and uncertain.”

    Lilja says that the game “had a number of strengths,” but the company realized that “when we come to a point where we believe that more time will not get us close enough to a version we would be satisfied with, then we believe it is better to stop.”

    The game’s initial early access launch had been set for September 2023, but it was pushed to March 2024, then June, and then delayed indefinitely in May before being officially canceled.


    The original article contains 292 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 25%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!