• Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    I didn’t even buy them at 60. This would change nothing for me except further cement my patient gaming lifestyle.

  • RabbitMix@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    They can make them more than $70USD and I’ll just keep waiting for a sale. I haven’t bought one at $70 yet, I’m certainly not going to pay even more.

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      I haven’t bought a game for more than $30 in over a decade.

      And that was a nostalgia purchase.

      Increasing the price just makes me want to go sailing.

    • Annoyed_🦀 🏅@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe he should start by paying himself no bonus and cut his own salary, seeing that the company is in a nosedive position when he’s in charge.

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    On the one hand, games have stayed the same price for a long time, well below the rate of inflation.

    On the other, wages have also stayed well below inflation for a long time. I don’t expect they’ll see the growth they want when a game purchase takes a larger and larger bite out of someone’s paycheck.

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s a good example for how inflation isn’t something constant that affects everything equally. Game development costs are mostly wages, if wages stay below inflation then development costs stay below inflation unless teams get larger, and especially game development is known for paying rather low wages.

      • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Development, yes. Executives, the sky is the limit.

        Especially when you have a great success, like laying off tonnes of your employees, which Embracer has been leading the charge on.

  • Majin Boowomp@techhub.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    @nanoUFO I’m still not used to new games costing $70 USD yet since I buy most of my games used. In my head, $70 games are still the “Deluxe Editions”. If someone released a $100 game, I’d probably think of it as the “Super Deluxe Edition” and wait for it to be $60.

    • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      I pretty much exclusively play and buy indie games nowadays but in Canada it’s around $80 to $90 for new games not including tax. Don’t think any AAA game would draw me for that kind of price. I could get selaco, crow country and probably world of goo 2 for that price.

    • Annoyed_🦀 🏅@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Sekiro still sell for 60 dollar. The industry figured out they can use scarcity in a form of limited time discount to encourage customer to make purchase, so there’s no need to lower the base price forever.

    • pkmkdz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Very often games are mediocre and/ or not even fully finished which results in a buggy mess,

      AAA trash, sure
      Indie games are often 10-20 USD and totally worth the money