• bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    I may have played Factorio for longer, but Factorio didn’t make me feel emotions like Frostpunk did. Playtime isn’t the only measure of a game’s worth.

    • otacon239@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      What Remains of Edith Finch is a great way to break this metric as well. Fantastic emotional rollercoaster of a story that’s over in about 2-3 hours. The original Portal also fits here. Probably about 4-6 hours for most people, but hits hard on quality and impact.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Playtime isn’t the only measure of a game’s worth.

      This concept seems to be lost on many these days. If a game doesn’t provide gaas-levels of constant content, or have endless “endgame”, it’s considered a rip-off. For me, some of the shortest games I’ve played have been the most impactful and worthwhile.

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Y’all be strawmaning me here. There’s such a wealth of video games to choose from, I generally have no problem finding stuff I will thoroughly enjoy while staying well above my value threshold.

        Additionally, how much a game costs to play per hr doesn’t necessarily have any relationship with how enjoyable it is.

        The article is specifically boasting about play time metrics, so I don’t think it’s unreasonable to look at how it compares to other games in similar or adjacent genres.

    • Arondeus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Go listen to Sentient a few more times while thinking about what you’ve done to those poor bugs and tell me again that Factorio doesn’t make you feel anything.