• Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think people actually realised back in the mid-to-late 2010s. The paid mod debacle, the shlock that kept going through, the failure of Steam Machines in their attempt to move to Linux… you get the idea. It was to the point where people were flat-out cheering for Epic Games joining the scene when they attached a storefront to their Fortnite launcher, which is unthinkable now.

    • verysoft@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      True, Epic could have provided good competition, but instead of gaining the trust of potential users and building a feature rich store - they immediately went down the most anti-consumer route they could with exclusive deals and free game bait, all while pretending they are the good buys and Valve are an evil-mega corp. The pot calling the kettle black. So yeah, fuck Epic Games.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        The free games system isnt anti consumer. And the exclusives are an industry standard, that steam also is involved in.

        You have a laundry list of actual hostile practices, why did you pick the two that arent?

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          No, steam isn’t “also involved” in paying publishers to take their games off of other platforms.

          Steam “exclusives” exist because every other platform is too dogshit to bother making a business relationship with.

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Exclusives are not paying publishers to remove games from platforms. Those are two completely different things.

            If you do not understand that simple fact, you probably shouldnt be wading into this discussion.

            • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Yes, they are. That’s what exclusive means.

              Only being on one platform because no other platform makes business sense is not an exclusive.

        • verysoft@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Steam doesn’t pay anyone for exclusives, no game on Steam is an exclusive title, they can be released anywhere else at the discretion of the publishers. Spending millions for free games to bait consumers to the platform is pretty anticonsumer yeah and buying out exclusivity deals is about as anticonsumer as it gets. Why all the delulu?

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean, yes, there will always be a minority (often quite vocal) who will cheer on the failure of any platform. No matter how good or bad it is.

      They weren’t by any stretch, an effective representation of the userbase. Most either stuck with Steam or installed the Epic launcher as well to get some free games.