• wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    The free games system isnt anti consumer. And the exclusives are an industry standard, that steam also is involved in.

    You have a laundry list of actual hostile practices, why did you pick the two that arent?

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, steam isn’t “also involved” in paying publishers to take their games off of other platforms.

      Steam “exclusives” exist because every other platform is too dogshit to bother making a business relationship with.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Exclusives are not paying publishers to remove games from platforms. Those are two completely different things.

        If you do not understand that simple fact, you probably shouldnt be wading into this discussion.

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, they are. That’s what exclusive means.

          Only being on one platform because no other platform makes business sense is not an exclusive.

    • verysoft@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Steam doesn’t pay anyone for exclusives, no game on Steam is an exclusive title, they can be released anywhere else at the discretion of the publishers. Spending millions for free games to bait consumers to the platform is pretty anticonsumer yeah and buying out exclusivity deals is about as anticonsumer as it gets. Why all the delulu?