• gubblebumbum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    all it does is prevent sideloaded apps from having access to sensitive permissions by default, which is a good thing.

    • skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      For what it’s worth, iOS sure has a lot of cons.

      • Camera app has icons at top of screen to control things like flash, but to adjust all the settings like “flash always on” you have to tap an arrow at the top, that then exposes another second flash control at the bottom with the same icon for the full menu.
      • Music app has a checkbox in albums and playlists that when tapped brings up a menu to delete your music, wat?
      • eSIM-only is terrible, cell service falls apart from time to time and you have to go deploy a new eSIM to make your phone be a phone again.
      • Dual-SIM support is convoluted. You’ll find yourself accidentally calling people on the wrong SIM until you manually configure every. one. of. your. contacts. to use the line of your choosing.
      • Touch is anemic, especially if using a screen protector. Try to take that photo? It will be zero or three photos, thanks!
      • Their swipe UI is barbaric, difficult, and mostly stupid, twitch your finger wrong and you go directly back to the previous app, or go into app switcher view, or nothing happens. Trying to “go home” you’re basically trying to give it an orgasm with all the up-swipes.
      • Missing common software buttons like Android’s back/app switch/home buttons means you’re constantly tapping at the very top, then the very bottom, or trying to use the back-swipe gesture, the UX is maddeningly inconsistent.
      • Left/middle swipe brings down notification drawer, right swipe brings down control center. Not nearly as consistent a behavior as swipe down once, or twice, for the respective drawers in Android.
      • New AI junk has added menus in settings for “Apple Intelligence & Siri” to every. single. app. that you have to switch 3 switches off per app to disable. Even if you don’t have their AI crap installed.
      • The silly FaceID waste of space dent makes it so you can’t see all icons like “am I on a VPN or not? Gotta check one of those top drawers to find out.”
      • Lack of in-screen fingerprint sensor and use of FaceID makes the phone unlock on you without intent if your face is near and it wakes for a notification, and also not unlock when you actually want to use it, in general.
      • The screen randomly wakes during phone calls if you’re using a headset and nowhere near the phone and just stays on for the duration of your lock timeout unless you manually force it to sleep, and then it’ll just wake again.
      • Trying to swipe out of active phone calls to get to the lock screen or apps will take multiple swipes dangerously close to the call hangup button, godspeed!

      Those are just the things I can recall off the top of my head.

      We need more mobile OSes. This duopoly is pure stagnation.

  • hollerpixie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is why I decided to not use Google services this Graphene install. I have zero doubt Google is going to try and lock down the ability to use anything outside of the PlayStore in an IOS type move. Just hope a better Linux based phone gets done quickly because I’m not sure how many iterations of alternate Android OS generations will be able to exist as they lock things down.

  • seang96@spgrn.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Though I understand the reason, I find this ironic given how invasive play store apps can be. My cars official app requires full location access all the time, otherwise it pops up asking for it every time you open it. Meanwhile some FOSS app that can be code reviewed and sideloaded is more difficult to give needed acess.

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Not to defend the shitty app, but it’s probably Google’s fault. Location access is needed to just query WiFi or do a hotspot. Probably features the app needs. They should’ve make that more granular.

      • seang96@spgrn.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        They need it for 2 things I believe.

        1. They show a map where vehivle last parked compared to you.
        2. They could use it for their proprietary phone as key feature that doesn’t work and is unreliable compared to using UWB.
        3. Gonna add this one since its totally the reason, sell your data. They store the car data, why not get the phones location data so you can get them all the time!
        • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Sure they sell the data…my point was just that they would probably need the permission even if they didn’t want your actual location.

          • seang96@spgrn.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            I haven’t deved android since before all of the permission overhauls but I believe aprpximate would suffice for those cases, and I don’t think they are actually needed. Luckily with a little bit of work and someones open source project I was able to get a home assistant integration to use their API and give them 0 of those permission requests.

            • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              I’m no android pro Dev, so no absolute confidence in my point. You’re probably right. And good you managed to bring it into HA without the permissions.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      and FOSS apps that can be fully code reviewed and confirmed safe, unlike anything proprietary, will still cause banking apps to refuse to run on your unrooted device. I had to go back to carrying a physical key around with me. (the foss apps were there first)

  • Jiří Král@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Will the permissions still be allowable by goinv to the app info page from the settings, clicking the 3 dot menu in the corner and taping to allow restricted settings?

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I don’t think it’s quite a bad as the title implies, though I wonder how long this slow process of locking down Android will contained for. Hopefully the EU demands from the likes of Epic will stop too much control being taken away from the user.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’ve been an Android user since the HTC Desire in 2010.

    I’m unsure what the author of the article is advocating, since the “raw deal” appears to be geared towards making the Android environment more secure.

    The author laments that they now have to manually enable security bypass settings and that some (they call it developers), but I’m not sure if they’re referring to Application Development or Phone Platform Development) “developers” can lock down with further API checks.

    I’ve been an ICT professional for over 40 years and security is always a balance. On the one end it looks like a phone in a locked room, inaccessible to anyone, on the other end it’s a free-for-all, open to anyone.

    I’m not at all sure what the author wants, except for wanting to roll back time to something less secure.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      I just wish the system had a global setting for “I know what I am doing, stop trying to protect me”. Stop revoking permissions you think I don’t need. stop restricting everything. Just turn all of those things off by default. I only have a couple apps installed, let me be the judge of me. And stop having me reconfigure every app individually just so you’ll let it run for as long as I want it to.

    • limerod@reddthat.comM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah, the author and people are fussing over without reason. Regular users do not understand the implication of sideloading apps. I have had people get their telegram/whatsapp hacked because someone sent them a malicious link and they sent their login credentials to that website/app.

      Restricting sensitive permissions will mean such people are better protected from such mistakes. Advanced users can still bypass the requirements even though it may be slightly complicated.

    • nesc@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It makes it frustrating to use, not secure. When installed program stops working after 30 or whatever days of me not using it because my great white master decided that it doesn’t need what was granted by me at installation is not security it’s just spitting in my face. I don’t care about what “developers” want why should anyone?

    • albert180@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Somehow No One needs that much Holding Hand or “Security” on the Computer, where No revenue streams of Google/Apple are affected

      • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        You have a very distorted view of security. The Apple computer ecosystem closely mirrors their phone and tablet system.

        Microsoft Windows is an absolute shitshow and continues to get worse at every iteration.

        • albert180@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I can Install on a Mac without any Roadblocks another Operating System, and I can Install Apps without the need for a Developer Account or a certificate unrestricted.

          Otherwise I’m using GNU/Linux which also doesn’t try to “protect” me in the interest of some Corporation

          • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Actually, no you cannot. You need to adjust and grant permissions for anything you install on a Mac OS system today.

            Source: I own a Mac, it’s less than six months old. Installing stuff is full of permission requests.

            As for Linux, I’ve used and installed it for over 25 years. It’s not ready for 3 billion home users and at the rate it’s going, it won’t ever get there.

            Yes, I know, Android is Linux, well done, here’s an elephant stamp.

            • albert180@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              Of course you can Install Asahi Linux on a modern Mac, and you can Sideload Apps too. Both Things which are Not possible on iOS without Major Roadblocks

            • ladfrombrad 🇬🇧@lemdro.idM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              I’ve also been using Linux for a similar amount of time, and it’s only at work now I have to use Windows.

              And as for home users using Linux? I have a few family members quite happy with Ubuntu / Firefox since all they need is a browser and VLC for their “PC”, so I don’t know where you got that “it’ll never get there” metric from.

              Alright they don’t have a clue how Jellyfin works on that box, but they sure do appreciate and use it a lot these days now they’ve got used to it / dumping Netflix.

    • vividspecter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Ultimately, the user should be able to decide for themselves how much security they are willing to compromise for power and flexibility. Whether this particular compromise is acceptable would depend on just how annoying it is in practice, but it’s a trend I’m not a fan of.

      On the plus side, if this compromises third party app store usage even more, it may be more fuel for the anti-trust lawsuits aimed at Google (although who knows how that will play out given who is becoming president).

      • Virkkunen@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        These new security features do not (and can not) apply to apps distributed outside of the Play Store, so it won’t compromise third party stores whatsoever.