Well that took a while but its finally here.

But also incoming Moon channel video now

  • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t get it. I mean I get it because it’s Ninty, but I don’t get why now?

    Has there been something in a major new feature update that has finally tipped the scales into clearly taking the piss, or have the legal team at Big N finally seen their erections subside after the game’s launch and only now can move enough to do something about it?

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Considering they’re going for patent infringement and not copyright infringement, it’s possible it just took this long for Nintendo’s legal department to find something even remotely tangible that they could sue over. And since they haven’t said what patents Palworld infringes on, I have to assume whatever it is, is very flimsy.

      • Hotdog Salesman@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        Despite their reputation for being quick, my opinion is that Nintendo does often take their time. Most of the things they take down do exist for months or years (and also follow the same format of a ROM hack that got a lot of attention so easy copy paste). My assumption is they’re just dotting their i’s and crossing their t’s and patent is just what they think they’ll have the best chance at winning.

        • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          Going back to Yuzu, Nintendo was in Discord and all over the place monitoring and collecting evidence even since Tears of the Kingdom launch. It took almost a year before the final attack with overwhelming number and secured evidence. Nintendo is not fucking around and is serious, that’s for sure. So if Nintendo attacks, they often have a point or (legal) reason to.

          That’s why I’m so curious in this case. I would hope that Nintendo being (legally) wrong for once.