apparently this is in response to a few threads on Reddit flaming Starfield—in general, it’s been rather interesting to see Bethesda take what i can only describe as a “try to debate Starfield to popularity” approach with the game’s skeptics in the past month or two. not entirely sure it’s a winning strategy, personally.

  • habanhero@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    You know what an even better take is? “We hear you, we’ll take your feedback” or just as good, say nothing at all.

    Arguing that you are smarter or wiser than your users / customers is paradoxical. You are by definition not smart if you attempt to do this.

      • skulblaka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        This particular dev didn’t. But the Starfield team at large has been blowing up the internet recently telling people that don’t like the game that their opinions are wrong.

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Emil Pagliarulo (guy quoted in the article), lead on Starfield, is known to have this attitude towards players. He’s also known to not like design documents, which explains the massively disconnected design of recent Bethesda games, especially Starfield.

        Emil is one of the giant reasons their games have been the way they have been lately and it’s why he’s being a baby about it