Yep. Also not a surprise that the wine society from the post is neither from Italy nor France :)

Oh no prototype in motion in video?

Then there was also this pdf very cool to keep as solarpunk inspo

https://secureservercdn.net/198.71.233.183/gkz.aeb.myftpupload.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Magnus-Aerospace_spherical-airship-converted-compressed.pdf

“This content is not available in your location”

Nooooooo let me see the big balloon plsss 😡😡😡😭😭😭😭

No.

my bad, sorry 🙊

Are you from the Us? It’s usually us people that speak about worldwide while talking about their country lol

Here in Italy WhatsApp reigns; also in most of Europe

Then there are WeChat, kakaotalk, telegram… Every of them has some country in which they rule

The blue bubble iPhone thing fixed by RCS is basically only us America from what I know

better

Let’s not compare oranges to apples :P

Signal has a different threat model

xmpp is in another kind of “trust”

“everyone” where? Worldwide it’s not true

Yes I couldn’t get past 2 minutes

He keeps blaming the cultural differences but then points out infrastructure, political and education differences

He is kinda forcing his “culture” point over the fact that he too knows that no product is a magical tech product that will improve any country

It’s not “western” design, it’s that technosolutionism kinda never work lol

For me, their “explanation” is pure nonsense

It’s badly written imo. There are 2 implicit informations:

• proton couldn’t give them anything else
• the ip was not used to track them anyway (yes it’s cringe to say but i mean I’m not Andy Chen nor the people who proof checked the post lol)

there are some providers that I don’t use

Ye, I’m asking to know which provider you use that does not comply with local law

sorry for making false promises

Promises were never false. They did not track ip and they don’t. They had to start for that specific user after the order…

It’s more like “we didn’t add extra clauses to our statements to make it clearer from start that bla bla bla”.

Marketing can be useful for a lot of reasons but it should never take the place of education. And vice versa.

Proton gave the IP address, person got arrested is the story I know and it’s the one presented in the euronews article

The euro news article also links the French source and they say that a lot of the work was analyzing photos on Instagram

What a weird statement to make to justify giving up an IP address

Cmon… It’s a sentence linked to the next one. They are not using that as a way to justify anything, they just explained how ip was “enough”.

I totally don’t trust them.

Not that you would need trust. Just use tor or a vpn if you need to hide ip while doing stuff you know police is interested in…

I wonder which email provider you are using right now after being so confindent :P

Are you sure you can’t opt out? The only stuff they send me is product news because I haven’t unsubscribed from that mailing list

do you happen to know if buying an old twizy around 1500euros is a bad deal? for having to change battery for example

It’s a free tool that the owner probably uses, it’s already a success :)

It’s sad that most people are commenting without even reading the article nor watching the mockumentary. We can be better than this :)

I watched it and it has some nice jokes and sketches in it. There is no blame, just plain explaining some psychological mechanism and also even mocking the corporate greenwashing.

It does not address capitalism, yes. It pushes Patagonia, yes. Still, it’s a good little video, I would send it to people around me if it was in my language.

Yep, this move was sad.

Like when Birkenstock, notoriously worn by communists here in Europe, decided to go public lol

honestly i don’t like automated systems based on content of the post rather than number

too easy to become biased against non native talkers and occasional promotion is healthy in a community

p.s. i’m also thinkign out loud, the web is too empty of actual discussions like the one we having right now, not everything has to be published only when finished :D (even tho on commercial social media it’s actually the opposite of having too much noise lol)

Thank you! I knew about fediseer but wanted to know more battle tested and technical solutions (if there were any) like, idk, having some kind of fail2ban but not so low level

Didn’t know about threativore, nice

Still weird we don’t have yet an automod directly into lemmy lol

(And I still get negative number of posts because of the deleted ones :D)(and they still have some cache like user should be able to restore their stuff, they shouldn’t)

i use this and i don’t feel like having any trouble, but on my pi i only have music rss and rss bridges

https://flirc.tv/products/flirc-raspberry-pi-4-case-silver

proposed by different people

English speakers internet literate so we would have already cut down most of the world

then we help each other within our limited means

So it doesn’t solve the problem that is the fact that the richer(s? 🤔) need to pay for the lasts and we would be just in a worse situation than now (at least here in Europe would be much worse than status quo, in US idk)

The system I propose applies to everyone who agrees, without geographic bounds. You pick and choose the agreements that you believe in, and therefore the people you want to associate with, and the way in which you want to associate with them. It’s consent vs coercion.

Yep I got this part right and I’ve also had the same idea in the past. But never tried to implement it because of the stuff we already saying + if someone is already paying 40% of their income in taxes how would they live agreeing to another set of law for another 40% of the remaining? Either all reclaiming some sort of indipendence from their country (and now we asking people much more than just following the rules, but to live as outlaws in their countries) or idk living with almost no income. Reclaiming land by grouping in an area and slowly taking political control by consent still looks more realistic and less dangerous to me (but it requires people to move and looks like no one wants that lol)

maybe even a nuclear exchange

People that want this could agree on this and could be the people that have the power to do that while us agreeing on not doing this with 0 power over them, for example. Or just most of the world agreeing on “there may be only 2 genders and 2 only” and stuff like this :o

I find myself wishing to exclude me and my people from the system but that would be just a way to protect us during the future events, not to actually change the world

Btw check out the, I think abandoned, basisproject.net in the meanwhile; also circles basic income

i kinda agree on everything and i also think about social networks with a positive outcome quite a lot myself so i’ve read it interested in the topic. The main issue is the old ‘‘the devil lies in the details’’.

sharing agreemement, easy; sharing them with technology, easy; creating communities around those agreements, kinda easy and so on. What’s the hardest bottleneck? actually recreating a whole legislation of agreements. All of this stuff doesn’t require a single platform, we already live deep down a form of this social network governed by game theory. Every platform we use every app every club we go to every group have implicit agreements.

So the question is: does making them explicit help or not?

My answer is… Not really. We have rules everywhere, also on this lemmy instance. I wrote them kinda carefully to be based on easily agreeable principles and to set a tone and, most of all, to be brief. Having agreements for everything goes against being brief and easily agreeable. The skii example is a good one: what if i don’t skii? i just don’t partecipate in the agreement and so weaken the power of those who do? What if all poor people agree on universal healthcare but rich people don’t? This brings us to the part of ‘‘convincing people to agree’’ and so we are just making politics from scratch again.

I think this comment is a bit chaotic but i’ll try to make a tldr: a platform like that would be overhead and in some cases also dangerous; we need to raise the common ground by talking to people, there are no tech tools to hack this (no, AI could just parrot an emphatic leader, can’t actually choose the words to connect to the person we have in front of). We can’t escape the political spade work :O

p.s. i also have on my mind to write a blog post about this, how people keep trying to solve the moderation problem with tech instead of just making it sustainable to resolve it socially