Have to say that was a damn refreshing change from the vacant look and feel in the debate. May be far from perfect but I take that over the raving lunatic with an R by them any day.

I’m fairly sure if they took porn off the internet, there’d only be one website left, and it’d be called “Bring Back the Porn!”

Because anyone needs a few hundred rounds a minute for hunting or personal defense of course. Wonder if there’s a path to sanity by attacking the proponents of these things obvious lack of skill (spray and pray) that they need to compensate for. Can’t let anyone question their abilities right?

https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2024/06/energetic-boss-rush-big-boy-boxing-gets-a-new-trailer-check-out-the-demo/

Just saw on another post

I guess do you mean with the cartoonish demeanor or just boxing ones as a whole? Have seen a few on playstation systems like knockout kings but they try and be all serious with it.

Oh there are folks already claiming the ‘not until appeals’ bit. Basically anything to calm the dissonance between ‘law and order party’ and ‘convicted felon is out nominee’

If they sent it in as unsigned, I’d take that as a subtle way to say “this dude want it and is the boss, but we don’t agree”. Happens often enough in the regular business world to, some exec days do it you can lodge a protest but it’s their name on the action.

Sharpe’s on a hurricane map, just scribble out the inconvenient things and the world is doing bigly good.

It seems like a weird balance to try and strike. They know he’s popular with a big chunk, it’s also known that he’s full of vile rhetoric that ‘should’ be easily taken as contemptible and have him sent straight to the shitcan.

In normal past time it might have done just that, but these days it seems just as likely people put it together as “he’s popular and says terrible things, therefore it means it’s ok to say terrible things” rather than this guy should be reviled for saying terrible things.