rrastro@sh.itjust.works to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 7 months ago…waited all year…external-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1159arrow-down11
arrow-up1158arrow-down1external-link…waited all year…rrastro@sh.itjust.works to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 7 months agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-squareazvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·7 months agoI’d say perfect date is dd-mm-yyyy. All other formats are just wrong
minus-squarehomesnatch@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·7 months agoTerrible date format… Not sortable numerically and often confused with mm-dd-yyyy. yyyy-mm-dd is the only way
minus-squareT0RB1T@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoYYYY-MM-DD if I’m inputting on a computer. But I’ve recently converted to YYYY-MMM-DD for anything handwritten. Because if someone is able to confuse 2024-APR-27 then they’re the problem. But the former format is better for digital sorting.
I’d say perfect date is dd-mm-yyyy. All other formats are just wrong
Terrible date format… Not sortable numerically and often confused with mm-dd-yyyy.
yyyy-mm-dd is the only way
YYYY-MM-DD if I’m inputting on a computer.
But I’ve recently converted to YYYY-MMM-DD for anything handwritten.
Because if someone is able to confuse 2024-APR-27 then they’re the problem.
But the former format is better for digital sorting.
The reverse even sorts itself.