• SineIraEtStudio@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Interesting stuff.

    I’d suggest reducing the decimals (significant figures) to a more readable amount (like 1 or 2). Additionally, inconsistent number of decimals makes it harder to compare down a column. Ex: 2.23 instead of 2.23758366384763.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Agreed. The data is interesting, but that level of accuracy likely doesn’t mean anything, and it’s really hard to read. Plus, humans are really terrible at conceptualizing large numbers (even if it’s ultimately a representation of a fraction).

      Accuracy may be important in calculations, but Excel will handle accuracy apart from forcing it to show only two decimal places.