I’ve seen much ado about what happens if Trump wins, and those points are especially valid. But at the same time, I don’t know if I can accept that you can brazenly fund and support genocide and receive my vote.

If you don’t believe there is a genocide in Gaza then good for you. This post isnt meant for you and I’m not interested in debating that point today.

Similarly, at least for myself, the answer of “what happens if Trump becomes president” isn’t the point here. I’m not saying that I’m not considering the impact of a Trump presidency, but i think it’s really important to answer what the world would look like after four more years of Biden.

  1. What happens in Gaza when Biden gets another term? He has lately taken some, IMO, token efforts to curb the genocide. But this is the best he’s done, and only after voter pressure. What happens when he’s no longer subject to pressure from voters like that? I cannot see it getting better.

  2. In the linked video, Burnie talks about workers rights, and I agree again that Trump would be worse. But Biden isn’t a progressive icon. Practically speaking, if he gets another term, I simply don’t see him moving the needle whatsoever on the rights and lives of small workers. I concede that he showed up to a UAW strike, but that cost him nothing. When the rail workers were striking, and his support would have actually taken literally any sacrifice, Biden chose to end it through legislative action.

  3. The environment was the thing in Burnie’s video which actually has me reconsidering. But I just can’t see Biden meaningfully curbing emissions. Not domestically, nor globally at the expense of diplomatic capital. It would be different here if I thought there was meaningful down ballot optimism. But, IMO, were going to lose the Senate and won’t reclaim the House. So if Biden gets his second term, he’s not going to have the power to take action on the environment. And so again I’d ask, what really happens if he gets to a second term? Another 4 years of inaction is too late. And worse, I wonder if he’s going to damage the democratic party while in office bad enough we’ll never have the chance again.

  4. It’s going to come up, and I’m not opposed to considering novel opinions here. A vote for a 3rd party is a vote for the opponent. Everyone says this. I simply do not buy it. Trump says it. Biden says it. Does that mean I’m voting for both of them? Are they lying? Because right now what I see is a vote for either of them is a vote in support of genocide.

    • off_brand_@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah. The “lesser of two evils” used to be about a republican being republican, and a Democrat at least pretending to be left of center. It wasn’t genocide or genocide.

      And people wonder why younger voters don’t engage with the system.