• Computerchairgeneral@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    “So, we alienated some people with our Harry Potter game and we alienated a lot of people with our soulless, live-service Suicide Squad game. What if we just combined those together?”

    Genius business strategy WB. Although, given how well Hogwarts did there are probably plenty of people out there who would go for that.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      its because people are always chasing what’s new. its the goldfish brain that people have (play whats new and get bored with it quick and switch games) that is ome of the causes or developers to keep developing new titles.

    • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because it usually means that you lower the quality of the complete experience to extract money from people willing to put money into it.

  • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    He pointed out that one of WBD’s latest big games, Suicide Squad: Kill the Justice League, was a disappointment for the company.

    […]

    “Rather than just launching a one-and-done console game, how do we develop a game around, for example, a Hogwarts Legacy or Harry Potter, that is a live-service where people can live and work and build and play in that world in an ongoing basis?” he said.

    How do you say “whoooosh” in corporate?

    • NoLifeKing@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Less games i need to worry about getting on my steam frontpage and pressing the ignore button…

      They are shit, all of them.