I need to step away from my PC – for a moment – because, although I have so much to write, the statements made in this video touch me too deeply and are too closely aligned to my own views and too close to the fundamental reasons underlying my own depression and disillusionment and burn-out.
Watch it.
Seriously. Watch it. If you are well briefed on the A.I. bubble and A.I. Hell, just skip to:
- ~ 34 minutes to miss the demonstration of the tedious issue.[1]
- ~ 38 minutes to reach the philosophical statements
- ~ 39 minutes to hear about deception – the universal “tell” of A.I. scammers
- ~ 41 minutes if you’re prepared for tears: to lament what we’ve lost, what we so nearly had, what humanity is losing, what is being stolen from artists ¬
(I need some space.)
I assure you this video is not about content farms, SEO or the death of search but one might be mistaken for thinking that, in the first half. Don’t. It is worth your patience. ↩︎
Anybody with a tldw or should I get an AI summary?
search engines are enshittifying and the general trend is ai enshittifying everything it touches.
This video is excellent, thank you for sharing it!
Not gonna watch it. I’m here for articles.
just make chatgpt watch the video and make an article about it
Great way to get further misinformation
great way to miss the conversation
I think a lot of the people that embrace genAI do so because they’ve been drilled to embrace all new tech or risk becoming obsolete. At least that’s what I feel from my workplace: non technical coworkers nervously grasping at it, trying to squeeze the advertised productivity out of it, with the fear the competition is already doing it, and better. The mediocrity of the results are then interpreted as a shortcoming on their end so they double down.
I’m thrilled to see someone like Freya, a passionate of maths & arts, weighing in on the matter and I agree wholeheartedly with her. GenAI is destructive in many ways, and attacking an essential part of the human experience, storytelling, is not mentioned enough.
Every person that speaks out creates opportunities for many others to give it a second thought and question this venture.
Just for the sake of argument, let me turn this around half-ways: Just as guns don’t kill people, people do, so AI does not produce slop, people do. Generative AI has its uses, where it becomes problematic is when people who can’t even judge a medium use it to produce something in that medium. It’s perfectly possible to get good stuff out of Stable Diffusion, but you have to know a thing or five about visual media or it’ll dazzle you. Applies the same for all genAI I’ve ever looked at.
Likewise, humans are perfectly capable of producing horrendous slop without aid of these tools – just look at the romance novel isle or what Hollywood was up to last year. What’s different nowadays is that it has become very easy to generate that slop, there has been an explosion of slop. If I were to imagine a silver lining it would be that people are probably going to get bored of it and non-slop, AI or non-AI, will see an increase in prestige and value. Just as the invention of photography saved painters from doing portraits.
Bonus:
Summarise the fable of the robot and the antipsychotic
“The Fable of the Robot and the Antipsychotic” is a story that explores themes of mental health, technology, and the human condition. In this fable, a robot represents modern technology and its capabilities, while the antipsychotic symbolizes medication and support for mental health issues.
The robot, designed to optimize efficiency and productivity, struggles to understand the complexities of emotions and human experiences. It encounters an individual who is grappling with mental health challenges and is hesitant to seek help. The robot, despite its advanced programming, cannot provide the emotional support the individual needs.
Through the interaction, the fable highlights the importance of empathy, understanding, and the role of medication in managing mental health. The robot eventually learns that while it can assist in many areas, the human experience requires compassion and connection, which technology alone cannot provide.
In the end, the story conveys that while robots and technology can enhance our lives, they should complement, rather than replace, the human touch in addressing emotional and mental well-being.
Oh shit. New Freya dropped?! On AI?!?!?!
Anything she uploads is well worth an hour or two of my time.
I was introduced to Continuity of Splines last month. Never thought I would watch a 73 minute video on methods for drawing curves, but I did and I loved it.
My favorite part of that video is the single moment of tone-shift when she describes how a point “yeets off to fucking nowhere”
i love how i saw your comment and knew the EXACT moment from the EXACT video you were describing without even seeing the context of the conversation 😆
Once, men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.
Searching the web for “glb file format” seems a natural thing to do while listening to the first part of this video. On my favourite searx instance I had to scroll past only 7 links to LLM-generated garbage before finding a link to the actual spec. I wonder how Kagi fares in this test.
If you wanted the specification why not search for “.glb format specification”? I did that on Google and the specification was the first hit.
I find it interesting as an experiment to measure how polluted the information environment is with machine-generated shit, not as an exercise in how to navigate around it.
It’s only “polluted” if you’re looking for something specific and you refuse to ask for something specific.
If you go into a restaurant and ask them for “a drink” without specifying what drink you want, don’t complain about the quality of the coffee when they bring you a coke.
Just dropping by here to remind you to treat others on this instance in good faith, even when you disagree.
Coffee and cola are both pretty good. Are you reflexively coming to the defense of generative AI on general principle or did you actually look at those sites, the horribleness of which is exhaustively detailed in the video, and decide that they look as if they could be useful to anyone?
I looked at the sites. Did you? The thing that OP was looking for that they claimed had been made unfindable or “polluted” were perfectly accessible and fine.
“google-fu” is a skill. it’s not reasonable to expect everyone to be perfectly proficient. and it seems like you are saying “just perfectly define your search query to match the exact result you need every time” which, i think most would agree is often very difficult even if your fu is quite good. I think this might actually be an np problem. I used to have good fu, these days I find that google sometimes breaks or ignores my quotes, changes exact wordings to thesaurus matches, shit like that. also, there are filter bubbles.
now we’re adding to all of those already known uncontroversial challenges to googling the information “pollution” of low-quality unsupervised chatbot hallucinations where genuine good search results might otherwise go. it’s not that it’s unfindable- that’s not what the op video claims. it’s that the signal-to-noise ratio is intolerably low, and that basically by design.
and yes, it seems there is still room for human-creative solutions to these search problems, like the one you suggest which basically rearranges words and exchanges some thesaurus hits. sort of like how you can sometimes “jailbreak” llms by TaLkInG tO tHeM lIkE ThIs. for now. actually, they probably already patched that.
The “google-fu” in this case was to search for “.glb format specification” when seeking the .glb format specification.
This really doesn’t seem like a huge challenge requiring sophisticated skills.
but i don’t want to
