hmm maybe! they should try harder in my non-insider opinion 😭
hmm maybe! they should try harder in my non-insider opinion 😭
hmmm ok i see that reasoning i guess. threw me for helluva loop tho.
imo if ur gonna change the display name then just change the comm name too. cuz this looks really iffy haha.
nope i double checked the reddit community before posting
note that the problem is that “white” is excluded from the display name, which could imply things about what mods believe about non-white folk.
No problem! It’s definitely confusing and attitudes on all sides don’t help the situation. I also was once a very confused outsider so glad my comment could help one other confused person 😅😅
Excellent ! 💃💃💃 Keep it up
Here you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_Sexually_Identify_as_an_Attack_Helicopter :)
It’s mine and the mods’ belief that the post is satire of the Helicopter meme (making fun of transphobic conservatives along with the community’s significantly trans makeup as a whole)
In contrast OP believes that the post is 100% genuine, and is nothing more than another iteration of the Helicopter meme a priori
If you think a pinned comment that says “trans rights are human rights, transphobia will be banned” and nothing more, is explaining the joke, then sure. I would love to see the joke explained.
Have a great day.
Awesome, well have a nice day.
here you go https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/12942107 first one i could find.
anywhere else on the internet such a post would be incredibly inappropriate, due to its obvious warping of the “trans agenda.” but in context, it’s self satire. you are certainly allowed to be uncomfortable with it, but i would never accuse the OP of being genuinely transphobic.
🏳️⚧️🩵🤍🩷
I think it’s just more possible than you might think from your POV that people are just utterly confused what is going on. Happened to me once and then I figured it out, so I try to give a couple seconds of good faith to help them out.
Not what I said, you conveniently left out the example immediately following this sentence. Please engage with me in context or not at all.
No. It’s equivalent to self satirical content you would see on c/196 or c/egg_irl, as I said.
Dude just be nice OP is a person who is understandably misunderstanding a very confusing situation. Escalating like this just makes people more angry on all fronts.
Yeah, it’s a common confusion. It took me a second to understand that they are just really into their special interest. Everything there is satire, to the extent that I think there is a rule that states “no serious posting.” It’s an incredibly abnormal community, and due to the deep and layered level of satire, they are heavy-handed with moderation because people mistake the satire for genuineness and try to get them banned.
Since some of the content may use the aesthetics of bigotry, for example, lots of jokes about mass murder and, as you see here, transphobia, I believe you’re allowed to feel uncomfortable with it. However, the evidence I have seen doesn’t indicate that any of it is genuine. If you are familiar with c/196 or c/egg_irl and have seen some of the satirical self-criticism in relation to trans identitiesthere, that’s the kind of vibe they have, but for planes and tanks and shit.
I don’t know. I subscribe because I find it interesting, and I haven’t seen anything nearly as hateful as what I have seen on like, !world@lemmy.world since I figured out what their deal was.
Having said that, I do wish that @nuke@sh.itjust.works would be slightly more transparent with what the community is about in order to avoid this kind of situation. They could put pinned comments under posts like this, stating that transphobia will not be tolerated and similar. (nuke if you are reading this, just like, consider it. Your community is well moderated from what I have seen but the attitude of the moderation doesn’t help outsiders get what is going on.)
unironically how the for-profit medical system works. https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/11/goldman-asks-is-curing-patients-a-sustainable-business-model.html
fuck yeah dawg this my shit right here 😼😼🕺
i can’t and nor do i want to because my instance admin did me the blessed service of defederating threads ❤️
excellent comment, analysis and subsequent defense of your position in the following discussion. i feel like i learned something, thanks for this homie. 👍
Answer: 45 and cloudy will melt snow faster in most cases. Snow is pretty reflective, so the heat transfer is more efficient when it comes from the air than straight from the sun, especially when there is wind to move and replace cooled air.
Since snow-melting is a thermodynamic process the investigation pertained largely to a consideration of the various factors influencing the transmission of heat to the snow-mantle. Of these factors, it was found that for high melting rates the heat contributed by convection and condensation of moisture through turbulent diffusion of warm moist air are the important heat-sources. The problem is, then, largely a consideration of the upper limit values of air-temperature, humidity, and wind-velocity compatible with an adequate snow-cover, and the relationship of these values to the rate of snow-melt. Light, 1941
ahh, thanks. i’ll delete this post as i clearly didn’t do my research.