• DdCno1@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Are you going to become a single-issue voter over this or are you willing to accept the fact that there is no politician who is perfect for you?

      • Titan@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        This isn’t about plastic straws or some other inconsequential deal, it’s about a fucking genocide. Jesus christ dude

      • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        If there was ever going to be a single issue to vote on, genocide should probably be it.

        • Onihikage@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I think most would consider democracy to be the single issue to vote on. When one candidate has repeatedly said he’d be a dictator “for one day, and then stop” and actively argues in court that the position he’s running for is immune to the rule of law, I’m voting in whatever way is most likely to result in his defeat. As much as I complain about the candidates and the shitty voting system, I cannot compromise on the right to vote.

          • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            So your literal argument is that if someone said, “I’ll end democracy in the US, but won’t hurt anyone”, and another candidate said, “I won’t end democracy in the US, but I’m going to conduct a genocide”, you would vote for the genocider? That’s pretty wild.

      • raccoona_nongrata@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Looking for representatives that don’t ardently support genocide and far-right fascists is not looking for a “perfect politician”. Meither is asking for them to not degrade our national security for the sake of those fascists.

        Not to mention if someone is neck and neck with some facing 90 felony counts maybe they’re not fit for office and should step down.

    • Onihikage@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      My understanding is that Biden is trying to be the angel on Israel’s shoulder because if he condemns them publicly then he loses the political capital to influence them at all. It’s a kind of good cop/bad cop routine on an international scale.

      • Titan@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t buy it. If he stops funding Israel, Israel won’t have shit left to attack Palestine with.

        • DdCno1@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s not correct. Israel is the 9th largest weapons exporter in the world. They can produce most of the weapons they are getting from America themselves, as well as a number of indigenous arms that you can’t get anywhere else. They have in fact entire ammunition factories ready to go online within days, just in case they need them. Getting aid from the US is however much cheaper for them (of course) - and it also buys America not insignificant influence over Israel and access to Israel’s high-tech weaponry, like the Iron Dome, Trophy and various drones, all of which are extensively used by US forces, as well as other close allies of Israel. That’s on top of all of the civilian research and cooperation, which is not insignificant either.

      • raccoona_nongrata@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Netanyahu does not respect Biden, there’s no real political capital there. Israel has fewer and fewer allies, it’s them who should be worried about expending political capital.