Another generation using the text from the I Ching as a prompt. This time it was hexagram 41 - Decreasing, with old lines in the second and sixth positions.
Another generation using the text from the I Ching as a prompt. This time it was hexagram 41 - Decreasing, with old lines in the second and sixth positions.
According to the haters, this is not art and they’d immediately be able to tell it was done using AI.
There can certainly be beauty, but can there be art without an artist?
Paint brush and generative AI both need a human to operate it. Neither can create anything alone.
I am not a hater (I am quite active in this community).
But I would still say this is not art and I’d immediately be able to tell it was done using AI.
This is a really bad drawing on second sight/first zoom. This model clearly wasn’t trained on rock formations in this drawing style. Or hands.
If a human had done this you’d call it a “really bad drawing”?
I find the black, thick webbing on the rocks really weird, yes.
Wouldn’t that count more as a critique of the style than of the technique?
No, it’s using the style of the rectangular blocks below where the black shading looks sensible and applies it to rock surface where it looks like marbling in the mountain instead of ridges or shades. And it gets worse in the back, where the mountainbase has a fingerprint pattern thats completely different.
Sure, but you’re saying that you’d call this “badly drawn” if it were made by a human. And the reasons you’re giving are that it isn’t realistic. But the two aren’t the same.