• Brickardo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Not only that, live service titles are absolutely tone deaf when it comes to respecting the effort of their players.

    It doesn’t stop Steve from being right with his statement, though, but his understanding of what a live service game’s monetization model should be has shown to be two or three parallel universes ahead of what the “triple A” projects usually do.

    Hell, paying real money can only skip you through the first dozens of hours of the tutorial. After that, paying effectively only allows you to get cosmetic options.

    • MarauderIIC@dormi.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      I remember when Warframe had Pay For Revives. Not sure if that was Steve.

      But many things in Warframe are much more player friendly these days.

      • Brickardo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s an interesting interview by NoClip which shows the early development phases of Warframe. They were stumbling their way around many new mechanics that come with a live service game.

        They don’t mention the daily revive system, but it’s clear that in the game’s progressive transformation from “tactical shooter” to “horde shooter”, that system had to go. I don’t remember if there were many complains about the system back then, though.