After laying off almost 2,000 people, Xbox finds itself in a position at odds with the community-first image it has cultivated for itself.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Will there is a distinction between the two though right? When you get fired, that’s it. You just stop working there. Being made redundant you also get given X amount of extra pay depending on their policies and the laws of where they are to make up for the time that they may be unemployed between jobs.

      • bobbytables@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thanks for the insight! I look at it from a European/German perspective and here that distinction doesn’t really exist or doesn’t really make a difference. TIL!

        • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s also worth noting when companies combine there are many positions that are redundant as things are shuffled around, that is literally different then just laying off people because of company performance or w/e

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d go even further: “They were fired so rich executives and shareholders could become more rich.”

    • Lath@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It also shows they have no idea what they’re doing. Redundancies are good for tech.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Depends on the ratio to total employed. A team of 3000 with 2000 with nothing to do, for sure! 20,000 with 2000 as backups/currently learning the ropes? A bit more reasonable.

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            You don’t employ people as backups. What you do is you share knowledge across the existing people so there is no single point of failure.

        • Lath@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I agree with that. So the contracts made beforehand should reflect this and expire naturally rather than actively laying employees off.
          Or is the title clickbait?

          If you need to fire a large number of employees then someone in management failed to manage.

          • Whirlybird@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            You’re forgetting there was a merger. Jobs that were necessary when there were 2 separate companies are now not necessary when there is only 1 merged company.

            Also it seems a large number of layoffs were for:

            • blizzards survival game that was reportedly in development hell after 6 years of development
            • the physical games department because Xbox is going all digital