I tripple checked before posting. 1b describes technological fashion.
Leg prothesis are not out of fashion for people who need them.
There is no alternative clearly superior v2 product that i could find either.
I tripple checked before posting. 1b describes technological fashion.
Leg prothesis are not out of fashion for people who need them.
There is no alternative clearly superior v2 product that i could find either.
I dont have any nitendo emulations but i guess this tells me i should collect some and save em on a harddrive just in case i ever need it.
Software preservation is a nobel act after all.
According to the dictionary the company is lying.
gasp you would deny the entertainment industry of their rightful profits?
Look at all this effort they did to entice our attention by exploiting our subconscious desire to rebel against the system.
Surely they deserve our loyalty and wealth for this feat.
I mean look at all the amazing things just Ubisoft has provided for us.
Like generous in game offers, recycling of gameplay and of course good old Fashioned systematic workplace harassment
Is this loss?
Inspirational demo provided by claude ai NOT A REAL REPORT
While mildly entertaining i doubt if anyone would really read such in full as a real article.
Former President Donald Trump took to his social media platform, Truth Social, to announce an upcoming debate with Vice President Kamala Harris. The announcement, however, was far from a straightforward press release, instead serving as a microcosm of Trump’s combative political style and ongoing feuds with the media and his political opponents.
Trump claims to have reached an agreement for a debate with Harris, scheduled for September 10th in Philadelphia, to be broadcast on ABC. However, the former president couldn’t resist taking a swipe at the network, labeling it “ABC FAKE NEWS” and describing it as “the nastiest and most unfair newscaster in the business.” This continued antagonism towards mainstream media outlets has been a hallmark of Trump’s political career and appears unabated.
The debate rules, according to Trump, will mirror those of a previous CNN debate. In what seems to be a dig at President Biden, Trump suggests these rules “seemed to work out well for everyone except, perhaps, Crooked Joe Biden.” The use of the pejorative nickname “Crooked” for Biden indicates that Trump is maintaining his strategy of assigning unflattering monikers to his political rivals.
Trump emphasizes that the debate will be “stand up,” with candidates prohibited from using notes or “cheat sheets.” This framing implies a preference for spontaneity and perhaps a criticism of prepared remarks. He also claims to have received assurances from ABC about the debate’s fairness, specifically mentioning that neither side will receive questions in advance. The parenthetical “(No Donna Brazile!)” likely refers to the 2016 controversy where Brazile, then a CNN contributor, was accused of providing debate questions to Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
In a particularly pointed comment, Trump alleges that Harris declined a September 4th debate on Fox News. He frames this as potential indecisiveness, stating the date remains open in case Harris “changes her mind or, Flip Flops, as she has done on every single one of her long held and cherished policy beliefs.” This accusation of inconsistency is a common political attack, though the sweeping nature of Trump’s claim is characteristically hyperbolic.
Trump also mentions the possibility of a third debate on NBC, again using the term “FAKE NEWS” to describe the network. He states that this potential debate “has not been agreed to by the Radical Left,” a term he repeatedly uses to refer to his Democratic opponents.
Trump’s announcement, while ostensibly about a debate agreement, serves multiple purposes. It’s a platform for him to:
The confrontational tone and use of nicknames and labels (“Comrade Kamala Harris,” “Crooked Joe Biden,” “Radical Left”) are consistent with Trump’s communication style throughout his political career. This approach continues to energize his base while potentially alienating moderate voters.
It’s worth noting that as of our last update, there has been no confirmation from Harris’s team or the Democratic Party about this debate. Given the unorthodox nature of the announcement and Trump’s history of making unverified claims, it would be prudent to seek corroboration from other sources before considering this debate as confirmed.
The announcement concludes with an all-caps “GOD BLESS AMERICA!” – a patriotic flourish that has become a standard sign-off in Trump’s communications, possibly aimed at reinforcing his image as a patriotic figure.
As the 2024 election cycle heats up, this announcement, regardless of its accuracy, signals that Trump intends to maintain the confrontational and unorthodox communication style that defined his previous campaigns and presidency.
“This part of the brand new technology that we are still figuring out is impossible”, refuses to elaborate
Is it possible that part of the message in this article is some nations would like us to give up on creating truthful AI? Saying hallucinations are impossible to fix is a great initial mood to vilify any uncomfortable truths it provided.
https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/2eaf9f8c-d422-4f19-b542-b4eb72c4f3ba.webp?format=webp
This is a side effect of too much doomscrolling.
Start of the article shows the genuine reaction is there: “Children giggle as young people flash their smartphones to film robots carrying plates of freshly prepared meals on their inbuilt trays to deliver to diners in a busy eatery in Kenya’s capital.”
I cant say I disagree though, this is putting pressure on some of the twisted dynamics we live by indeed but i think your question doesn’t really work, exploiting people isnt the point, generating value with no regard of other life is and robotics make good slaves. The real issue is how will humans survive in an economy where there labor can no longer be used to obtain a share of the earth-pie.
What we can do is be vocal about normalizing universal basic income which has proven to work. This way we can still be hyped about the technology. Its going to be a matter of either we do get there or we wont live to tell the difference.
Nothing wrong with learning that doing things should not always require material compensation. I never met an adult who was confused by the concept of getting paid.
I met plenty who are baffled that anyone would do something out of kindness and free. Even hobbies are often talked like i should be trying to monetize my work.
And then right wing gets to power and hands them a tax cut.
Its what i said, they stink to much for PR to matter whats left is a non profit that is a long term for profit investment trough politics.
I do appreciatie the technical explanation though. And i know there are plenty of corpos that pull that very same shit.
Shell has a non profit part? Literally don’t believe it regardless wether they have the paper work to legally state such thing. Its gotta be for profit with backdoors or they wouldn’t bother. No amount of good will tokens can fix the evil from their brand.
This implies a significant part of these peoples daily work tasks is time wasters that keep you loyal to the company but don’t have much actual value.
They haven’t damaged anything. They just bait the news into writing publicity for the cause and it works because people believing “they damage an artifact” generates clicks.
People have publicly killed themselves to to make people pay attention to the biggest challenge humanity has ever faced.
Such is unaffective because news doesn’t cover it.
The chemicals in our rain from industrial waste that will wash these stones clean, do way more damage. But you don’t know that because not enough people talk about it.
People are entitled to express what they think happend.
It’s not like they made a website and are sharing links to supposed evidence of conspiracy.
I don’t disagree with what you say but you are very much overreacting.
In 10 years wel see a document art about the whole case and that will be how the majority of people will learn any conclusion.
Well you could always just use the proper name. The cc license in question IS anti commercial. A great deal of ai is opens source and non commercial and to those cc is fair game. But if commercial is where you draw the line then envoking this license may do.
This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International)
Calling it “anti-ai” when its not removes power from your argument. Your invoking something that does not exit and linking to something seemingly unrelated.
Now the bigger question i have, have had since i have seen people do this.
Why is there still not an actual anti-ai license? Seems obvious that there is a need for it? I dont know much about how licenses are created but it strikes me as odd.
Well i understand its to combat ai from training on your comments right, maybe also to poison the data?
I just don’t see what taking a non relevant licensee and giving it a different name is doing to stop that. Trivial to filter stuff like this out in a dataset.
At best an individual data scraping company decides to honor it out of kindness. At worst people think that its a real license and copy it with a false sense of security.
Just FYI the license in your comment doesn’t actually exist and the creative commons license it links to does not mention AI anywhere.
How is this still up to debate?
Does it come with linux support?
I still wont use it if its optional but id be nice if they supported there own product on the fastest growing Gaming OS