rand_alpha19

It’s pretty generic overall, but some parts of the worldbuilding are better than others. It fits together in fun ways, and the later stuff is better, but most of the early-game stuff is bland. Just FYI - I never beat it, but I played about 40 hours in 2015 and right now I’m about 10 hours into a replay.

I don’t know if it’s just because of the time since I’ve last played, but Re-Reckoning has felt like a lot more of a chore to play than the original. I don’t remember absolutely loving the original, though; it was always pretty mid, I just thought it was charming.

Removed by mod

Do what you want, its your experience that is ruined, not mine.

The fact that you believe there’s a single way to play a game is so fucking hilarious when stuff like speed-running and challenges exist. Oh well. Enjoy your purist bullshit.

If the opinion is “playing on easy means you don’t actually want to play,” I’m gonna give it the criticism it deserves.

Let me have my opinion. Why even leave your comment if you are pro-opinions?

Or maybe they just don’t have fast reflexes so easy is… easier. My wife almost never plays on normal because she can’t.

If she plays on normal, she will never finish the game and be so frustrated that it will cause her not to enjoy her evening. She works a lot and needs to de-stress when she gets home, so playing on easy is the best way for her.

Stop judging people. Just play your game and enjoy it.

I would recommend Kingdoms of Amalur: Re-Reckoning. The normal mode is already stupid easy, so you feel like a god on easy mode.

It’s a fantasy setting with a ton of story and lore, so if you don’t care about that it may not be for you.

Last pre-order I made was Fallout 4, because it was a birthday present for my ex and her birthday was before the game came out. It’s just not worth it otherwise.

Well, if I’m listing them, I think they hold up. Not sure why I would list stuff that doesn’t hold up, right?

If interested, you can decide how well it holds up for yourself. :b I think all of them are good. I guess I missed part 2 of the task, but really, I can’t objectively determine that for anyone.

Also I saw a ton of other people who just listed a show and said it’s fun or cool or something, without saying how well it holds up, so I thought it would be fine.

• Courage the Cowardly Dog
• Gargoyles
• InuYasha
• The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy
• Aaahh!!! Real Monsters
• The Powerpuff Girls
• Serial Experiments Lain
• The Weekenders
• The Ripping Friends
• The Proud Family
• Avatar: The Last Airbender
• Fillmore!
• Dave the Barbarian

Some of these might be hard to find. They all hold up IMO. See for yourself.

I was so excited for The Incredibles 2. I wanted to love it so bad, but I just didn’t. The writers and producers didn’t seem to understand that the family unit aspect was literally the one thing that made it unique. Adding more people IDGAF about was dumb, and the villain was obvious and boring.

All that to say that they’re gonna need to convince me this time. I fucking can’t deal with hollow sequels that just add previously unmentioned characters and plot elements to fill the gaps in creativity; I was also really disappointed by Frozen 2 so I’m not seeing Frozen 3 unless I hear that it’s more like the first one.

Link to the pre-print version for those who want to read the full work without paying for Nature (hit the “Download” button for the PDF).

So how are you supposed to be able to double-blind a study involving MDMA? It seems essentially impossible, which makes it inevitable that this will always happen at every review, no?

Why is double-blinding so important in this specific instance to the point that it’s best that the buck stops here?

Seems like an easy way to kill momentum of a life-saving mental health treatment because it’s politically inconvenient (and maybe endangers existing pharmaceutical products?).

I (and many other PC gamers) will never buy a PS5 simply to play a sequel. I would sooner watch a let’s play or just not engage with it at all.