The catarrhine who invented a perpetual motion machine, by dreaming at night and devouring its own dreams through the day.

  • 0 Posts
  • 248 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 12th, 2024

help-circle
  • There are a few things that Stallman really does not get.

    1. Power over an individual reduces their ability to consent, and adults have considerable power over teens.
    2. The discussion about having those teens accessing pornography should be handled separately. It’s simply not the same matter.
    3. Pornography and nudity are not the same thing.
    4. No matter how bad witch hunters are, this should not be used as a defence for the alleged target of their witch hunts.
    5. “Normal” or “natural” are not the same as “should be taken as morally, ethically, or legally acceptable”.

    Once you take those things into account, you notice that most of the things that Stallman talks about the topic aren’t just immoral, they’re outright idiotic.





  • Right, because a hacker getting vengeance for those abuses totally isn’t the narrative people would prefer.

    Maybe, in the short term. But as people feel like the vengeance was successful, the topic gets its emotional conclusion. Then the focus shifts from how that leak popped up to the contents of the leak:

    • code and map editors for really old (more than a decade old) games
    • tidbits of info that might excite people about new games

    Of course, I might be 100% wrong, and the leak might be actually the result of someone getting undue access to that content, or some insider getting pissed and leaking the info that they had at hand. I just think that Nintendo+GF+TPC are scummy enough to forge being leaked for their own benefit.






  • Then as you ask “provide sources.”, it says simply “Source: Tech Review Websites”. If this came from an actual person I would genuinely ask it “do you take me for gullible trash?”.

    It’s still somewhat useful, due to Google Search crumbling away into nothingness, if you ask “link me five sites with info about [topic]”.




  • It’s pretty clear that democratically speaking, we do not object to companies arbitrarily removing access to purchased video games. Only a minority objects to it.

    It’s more like “people don’t know about the issue, or how it affects them, as they’re busier with their everyday lives”. This happens a fair bit.

    Additionally, the graph shows that the movement had huge fervour at the start but then lost steam. So:

    • Is the movement well organised?
    • Are there people actively asking others for new signatures?
    • Is the movement able to recruit more people to proselytise it?
    • Which areas of the EU have proportionally less signatures? And why?
    • What’s the public image of the movement? And what about the cause itself? (People do realise that legislation to not kill games makes it easier to pass legislation to not screw with customer goods after they were bought, right?)
    • What caused that peak in the 7th of September, and how to replicate it on purpose?

    EDIT: can someone convince PewDiePie to at least talk about the campaign?



  • Kids and dogs:

    • are messy eaters
    • are loud at inconvenient times
    • spread dirt on your clean floor
    • run and play like hell
    • sleep like rocks
    • complain about being thrown into the bathtub
    • complain about being taken off the bathtub
    • silently wreck your things once left unmonitored
    • are too cute to scold properly
    • annoy the hell out of your neighbours
    • and you still can’t stop loving them. ♥

    So yup, having one is perfect practice for the other! Although people typically do the opposite (use dogs to train for kids).