Valid. I never had anyone do my assignments for free and in few minute though. It seems unreasonable to assume that this has no multiplying effect. After all, I have no hard numbers either

What exactly was the tool we cheated with in the past that was equivalent to LLMs? What is your certainty based on?

I put a banana on my screen for reference and your banana seems laughable. No penis joke intended

That makes sense, but my understanding is, what Google considers Family content is not an add-on to regular content. Your content is not also for children, it is catered towards them. This implies using dedicated Google functionality, special SDKs, and so on, to comply with law. So your product needs to be designed in a very specific way to be eligible. I’m not aware of how Google Play restricts children from installing certain apps, but you can always install an app through a parental supervisor account.

To me, this story seems like a lot of crying over a situation that is not fully explained.

Why would you enlist a map app under the Families program in the first place though?

Complaint about misuse of time zone identifiers. I truly love you. Keep doing what you do. We need you.

That sounds valid. I was thinking about the fact that most carbon credits are generated from deforestation reduction projects that renew yearly.

Climate was only cool while you could buy fake carbon credits to make up lies about responsible computing at scale. Now we save the world with AI once again. Next year, compute on mars, true planetary scale! Cloud? We’re doing Starsystem now!

There is no peer review with these scam publications. You pay your flat fee and get published. That’s it. This is how climate change deniers and all other nut jobs get their studies too. This has been going on for years. This is a cute joke that cost roughly 3K https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cell-and-developmental-biology/for-authors/publishing-fees