They don’t want to remind people about all the chemicals they’re putting in the water?

Frankly, I doubt he said anything worth listening to.

Mozilla is notoriously pro censorship, they blocked dissenter a while ago.

Yeah, after that I’m not really interested in what the grifter thinks.

I’m surprised it lasted this long. It was always kinda just a marketing gimmick for broadcom that got out of hand.

Literally the only thing I wished google would copy from apple, and they are managing to screw it up.

Apple puts a DRM chip in their peripherals, the fault for this happening is mostly on them.

I don’t see how that makes sense as a statement, an ai with access to a 56k modem can send a fax. It feels like they’re just using ai as a buzzword.

This isn’t really anything new, it’s just historically had less sympathetic victims https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/oct/16/academics-are-being-harassed-over-their-research-into-transgender-issues

I’ve long thought that if politicians want to see our whatsapp messages, all politicians’ whatsapp messages should be published publicly.

No, it’s proper thermal, like predator vision, just doesn’t let you see through walls unfortunately.

Night vision security cameras use near IR, thermal is long wave IR.

I have a phone with one, it’s just been a neat toy so far. I do know someone who used a USB-C module version to track down wasp nests though.

Oddly, despite being older, the resolution of the infiray “camera” in mine is 256×192, higher than the FLIR unit in this phone.

It looked interesting, but it’s £3,595

the tl;dr is: he asked nicely for the source code and they gave it to him?

It’s a shame they don’t embrace federation and open source more, the drama it would create would be fun at least.

I don’t think you can simply say something tantamount to “I think you’re an evil person btw pls don’t reply” then act the victim because they replied.

If the CEO had been sending multiple e-mails etc, I would agree with you that it’s harassment, but from what I can see at any point the blogger could have just disengaged, but he seemed more interested in getting the last word in.

I agree, both of them seem like a bit of a dick.

Although the blogger doesn’t appear to be a journalist, so things like “right to reply” doesn’t legally apply, it still seems like like basic good manners to offer that to someone if you write a hit piece on them. The comment section on blogs were traditionally a good tool for that, but the blogger seems to decided to not have one on his site.

Shrinkflation strikes again

Shitty DRM is still DRM.

It’s amazing that a company who’s primary product is a DRM system managed to make so many people think they’re the “good guys”

I’d probably use it if it had a clippy skin tbh.