They didnt flop because they are new. They flopped because there wasnt a demand for what they were selling. What was the price tag again?
Almost like the price was what killed it.
They didnt flop because they are new. They flopped because there wasnt a demand for what they were selling. What was the price tag again?
Almost like the price was what killed it.
And what did happen to those apple VR goggles?
Bg3 is not the game to argue didnt live up to its cost, thats for sure.
How is this title allowed to be so misleading?
If anyone reads the article, the guy is arguing for honesty and transparency with video game prices as opposed to the multi-tiered and/or subscription based schemes that are used currently.
"‘I don’t love the artificiality of pricing structures post-retail,’ Douse wrote. ‘Use the inflated base price to upsell a subscription, and use vague content promises to inflate ultimate editions to make the base price look better. It all seems a bit dangerous and disconnected from the community.’
Douse believes games should be priced based on their ‘quality, breadth, and depth’, instead of simply being fitted to established pricing structures."
He’s saying the base price should be higher because there should only be one price.
Its awful with at least every article posted on world.