Primarily0617

i know but i’m roleplaying a semi-informed fan

i think it’s fair to say that at least a portion of bethesda’s reputation is built off that game

Dark Souls lore seems deeper than it is because it’s less coherently presented than in TES.

It feels like Skyrim was the game they’d (and by they I mean Todd) always wanted to make, and Skyrim was the first time they had the resources and technology available to make it more or less exactly as they envisaged.

Fallout 4 probably would’ve been in the exact same situation of the technology finally catching up to their ideas, except they completely botched the landing by adding in voiced characters.

• Fallout 3 releases and it’s good
• Fallout New Vegas releases and it’s great
• Fallout 4 releases and it’s disappointing but it’s okay because it’s just a blip. They had some good new ideas in there, they were just balanced out in the other direction by a lot of bad ones. Bethesda’s track record is still solid, if somewhat tarnished.
• Fallout 76 releases and it’s disappointing but that’s because they’ve never made (and shouldn’t have made) an MMO before. A lot of the coverage is centred around the shoddy launch, which doesn’t really matter for a non-MMO title.

that’s not boobs that’s boob

Surely I know when I want my phone’s battery replaced, because I’m the one using it?

if you’re reviewing specific things you don’t like, that’s reviewing a product

leaving a negative review because “OW1 was killed off” isn’t doing that

if you want to discuss specific things you don’t like, please provide some that would reasonably justify OW2 being literally the worst reviewed game on steam rn

“i liked overwatch 1” is not a valid review of the game overwatch 2, and people leaving reviews to that effect en-masse is pretty textbook review bombing

leaving a negative review because of that would by definition be review bombing, because at that point you’re not reviewing the game, but external context that surrounds it

by “tries to rob you blind” you mean a game with entirely optional additional purchases?

wow you’re right they really get you with that “you can pay if you want” model

it’s practically criminal definitely worthy of being the worst ranked game on steam

deliberately steal a game people liked to replace it with an addiction machine

what the actual fuck are you talking about

Today’s concurrent player peak is ~47k.

Why would 47k people choose to play the game when it’s the worst game on Steam? Literally worse than a game like Bad Rats: the Rats’ Revenge that fundamentally doesn’t function correctly. For reference, its peak today was about 20 players.

Before you reply with something like “marketing”, you seriously think that if Bad Rats launched today, and with the same marketing budget as OW2, that it would achieve anywhere close to 47k players peak 10 months after its release?

Like I said: you’re disconnected from reality if you think OW2 is the worst game on Steam.

You’re entirely disconnected to reality if you think Overwatch 2 deserves to be the worst-reviewed game on Steam.