NoneOfUrBusiness

Will Hamas stop if Isreal does?

If Israel stops its apartheid and ethnic cleansing? Certainly.

Stochastic terrorism folks.

Pretty sure nobody cares, but man as a third world country guy it feels weird as fuck to see these reasonable-looking numbers only to multiply by 50 and get a heart attack.

It does, but that’s the thing: It does either way. There should be no change due to the conversion of energy to mass.

Correct me if I am wrong, but as I understand it mass and energy is equivalent no?

Yes.

And it also still baffles us as to why rest mass and resultant mass from energy should be equivalent at all?

I don’t know about this one. I’m not an expert so don’t quote he on it, but I don’t remember hearing this before.

So I wonder, even if it’s only appearing very briefly it’s still going to exert some small gravitational effect.

I don’t think so. Remember: This is energy being converted to mass, not mass coming out of nowhere.

I mean whether God exists aside, if you’re buying Jews’ (especially Zionist Jews’) God’s chosen people spiel you have your own problems.

Ramping pressure over time is/was the best available strategy.

I don’t see it working. Pressure only matters when there’s real leverage at play, otherwise you get the current mess.

Iran and Israel can not be maintained in the same sphere of influence without copious amounts of hard and soft power that only the US and maybe China possess. So the Russia route is out unless they wanna lose Iran and they probably don’t want that. China is more viable, but the thing is: China wants the Middle East on its side. They’ve been posturing for that for a while now. Taking in Israel would destroy all that in a second.

Honestly no. Bad representation is worse than no representation. This is an extreme example, but just look at Muslim representation in Western media. I mean just take the extremist terrorist Muslim, or the idea that Muslim women are oppressed and need to be “liberated” from their hijab.

Again this is an extreme example but this is what bad representation is; it reduces a group of people into a few stereotypical character traits. As a Muslim I’d rather Islam not be represented at all if this is what that representation will be.

Plus there is still an issue of Hamas.

Say what you want about Hamas but they’re much better than the IDF.

I mean not too little if it actually works as intended, but roughly 1 million people dying to starvation too late given they’ll take two months to build it.

I mean not too little if it actually works as intended, but probably roughly 1 million people dying to starvation too late given they’ll take two months to build it.

The thing is: You need young people to support old people. This is irrespective of economic model; an upside down pyramid just isn’t a sustainable demographical situation. This could change as automation gets better, but for now both UBI and increasing birth rates are necessary. You can see this now in Japan needing foreign workers because there are more jobs that need to be done than people.

You want 1917 and yes, at least in the Middle East anti-Semitism soared after that.

Peace treaties are just a nicer name for one side surrendering.

You’re either being willfully obtuse or have zero knowledge of history. Either way you’re using a very convenient definition of surrendering. If you interpret the aggressor pulling out as surrendering then yeah a lot of wars will end in one surrender or another, but that’s not how that works.

What about the winter war?

Uh… Neither? Usually peace is preferable in cases like this. So from that perspective it’s Israel and its far-right government that has sworn against a Palestinian state multiple times that should back down, but nobody needs to surrender to anyone.

Gaza has been attacking Israel for it’s entire existence, and far worse since Hamas took over 15 years ago.

Israel has been attacking Gaza for about the same period of time too. Occupations are an act of war.

Some people aren’t subbed to all communities so there’s benefit to reposting the same article to multiple communities.