![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://voyager.lemmy.ml/api/v3/image_proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbeehaw.org%2Fpictrs%2Fimage%2Fcd7879c3-cd1c-4108-806e-f9ca45e9b22a.png)
I’d say we need a Supremer Court to counter these people, but they’ve already made the Supremacist Court, so how do we top that?
I’d say we need a Supremer Court to counter these people, but they’ve already made the Supremacist Court, so how do we top that?
This article is specifically talking about the use of hydrogen blended into natural gas pipelines as a way to reduce dependence on fossil fuels for heating and cooking. Ammonia as a transport mechanism has no place here.
The current consensus in the industry is that you can replace up to 20% of the natural gas with hydrogen in a pipeline with no adverse affects. This article is indicating that there may in fact be some adverse affects.
Edited to fix some stupid autocorrects. At least it was mainly verb tense this time.
Maybe God doesn’t like this abomination? Isn’t that the take-away religious folk make whenever mother nature does what mother nature does?
This is how I won all of the reading contests in elementary school. Sure I loved to read, but I also loved winning and the dummies only tallied books read, not pages or minutes or anything more reasonable.
Somebody’s too fancy for Malt-O+Meal cereal bags.