From the company that complained too many people were using their serivce

Seems if the messages are sent in an inherently insecure fashion, all one would need to do is set up an instance that purposefully does not filter out all the things it’s supposed to be kind/competent enough to filter out, and boom it has everything.

Yeah, this would never work on Android! Oh, wait…

Oh would you look at that, trying to kill off the open source alternative fork of your product you tired to close off before your acquisition by IBM.

This is the kind of shit companies are trying all over against everyday consumers, now trying against enterprises. Hope HashiCorp’s acquisition falls through and they go under! OpenTofu for life.

Still not convinced he was able to RCE their machines through the games. Aren’t there clips of one of the streamers downloading someone posted in a link somewhere?

“I’ll just find someone who can afford it”

Incorrect. Rogue-lite allows you to collect upgrades that are permanent between runs. Roguelike makes you start from square one every time.

It’s literally why they invented a separate term.

Next week: Paco Guttierez, age 9, arrested and sued for $200 million after building a cardboard Nintendo game because his family couldn’t afford the real thing

Nah, I’m traveling. Never seen a totality before and there won’t be another in my area for the rest of my life. Last chance semi-locally unless I somehow end up in another part of the world.

Someone order him one of those Dark Brandon mugs

Yeah, ZFS rocks these days. Fast and rock solid for me, even on older hardware. I run my whole array as mirrored vdevs (so, basically a bunch of raid 10) to keep resilver times down when i replace drives. No issues so far!

And yet you interacted with them rudely and got mad when they showed you the door for your rudeness

Big lib energy

So you go to their instance, call them Russian shills in so many words, moderators delete your comments and your reaction is “UGH TANKIES ALL LEFTISTS ARE TANKIES”

Bro go touch grass, too much internet for you

Speed is usually the reason. SSDs in general are faster, enterprise SSDs are not only faster but much more write-tolerant and last a very long time in comparison to consumer SSDs.

They can also (in many cases) do write caching at the speed of a DRAM buffer, making the bottleneck the SATA or SAS bus itself (SAS is like enterprise SATA, 12Gb/sec as opposed to 6). NVMe can be even faster. This means that programs (ie Lemmy and its database) that write data aren’t waiting around for the drive to acknowledge the write before that program can move on to other things. Shaving off a few milliseconds per write can make a massive difference when you realize there might be millions of IOPS (Input/Output operations Per Second) under load. The requirement for low latency is everything in servers.

When you are running a public service and requests are coming in constantly and at a high rate, you really really do not want storage latency to bottleneck you, as that is a problem that will compound extremely quickly. This is a big issue with HDDs as well, as even disk seek times add to the problem, let alone caching/buffering writes.

We could talk all day about if four SSDs in a RAID 10 are optimal, but sometimes you have to think about budget and complexity as well. For the load that a popular Lemmy instance might currently draw, I’d make an educated guess that this might be sufficient for now. Room to expand was also mentioned, which is the second most important part of a storage plan.

No, no we get it. It just isn’t very funny at all.

So? You said you wouldn’t lay them off if you could merge.

I mean I also understand the sentiment that the right thing should be done regardless, but if that’s what it takes then that’s what it takes

Wait, Edge fanbois are real??

It was doable with the PS3 and then they took it away

Considering you can put your own on a raspberry pi for free and run it locally, there isn’t much reason for Alexa anymore anyway