• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    7 months ago

    Insects and Other Animals Have Consciousness, Experts Declare | Quanta Magazine

    There’s “a realistic possibility” that insects, octopuses, crustaceans, fish and other overlooked animals experience consciousness.

    There’s a special place in hell for title writers.

    • GONADS125@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I totally agree with your criticism about the headline, but declaring octopuses have consciousness isn’t a stretch at all in my opinion.

      I highly recommend reading my blog post on animal cognition, culture, and personhood.

      I have ads turned off and do not benefit in any way from my blog. I feel confident that my write-up should persuade open-minded individuals to give other animals the benefit of the doubt regarding possessing consciousness.

      I have doubts about insect consciousness is any sort of relatable sense to humans, but many other animals absolutely possess consciousness similar to humans.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    If consciousness is merely defined as being aware of one’s surroundings: I would think that most living things have it.

    Has the actual mechanism of consciousness been discovered? Do we know what causes it? Where it comes from? How it is separate from simply reacting to stimuli?

    • Deconceptualist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      The fundamental mechanism is still unknown, however we do know some important details about consciousness:

      • It’s not a simple binary all-or-nothing
      • It can change naturally or artificially
      • It’s divisible and perhaps even additive

      We know this due to a number of phenomena:

      • Natural variation in states like awake, alert, groggy, asleep, comatose
      • Altered states due to alcohol or drugs (drunk, high, caffeinated, hallucinating, suppressed with anaesthesia)
      • Disorders such as Body Identity Dismorphic Disorder (BIID - thinking a major limb doesn’t belong to your body) or Phantom Limb (sensing an limb that isn’t there). Look these up if you’re unfamiliar, they’re fascinating.

      Together these and other observations suggest that consciousness is an emergent phenomena (not present in simple organ structures alone) and occurs along a scale, likely proportional to brain size. And just as your daily state can change (between sleep and wakefulness at minimum) it seems a reasonable hypothesis that other creatures experience something similar, though perhaps with a lower maximum awareness in their most alert state.

      • exocrinous@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Also we are familiar with informational structures - thinking machines - with a greater intelligence than their single biological components. For example, an ant hive. Each individual ant is a simple creature, programmed with instructions that allow a hive of ants to manage armies, roads, farms, nurseries, exploration, hunts, and war. Likewise, humans are able to come together and form communities, nations, corporations, and religions. Compound intelligences with a vast, inhuman intelligence.

        I believe that if knowledge and awareness create consciousness, then human organisations must be conscious beings.

  • azi@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I really don’t understand their examples. Like I get self-recognition and memory but what makes play behaviour, curiosity, anxiety-like states, and problem-solving signs of consciousness? These are at the end of the day organisms responding to stimuli, something all organisms by definition do. Is pain response a sign of consciousness but something like phototaxis isn’t only because the former is ‘complex’ and the latter ‘simple’?