silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 7 months ago‘Wake-up call’: pipeline leak exposes carbon capture safety gaps, advocates say | Estimated 2,548 barrels of carbon dioxide leaked from Exxon pipeline in Louisiana on 3 Aprilwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up145arrow-down10
arrow-up145arrow-down1external-link‘Wake-up call’: pipeline leak exposes carbon capture safety gaps, advocates say | Estimated 2,548 barrels of carbon dioxide leaked from Exxon pipeline in Louisiana on 3 Aprilwww.theguardian.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareHanrahan@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoHow mich energy does that take (not the tranport, the liquefying). That HAS to be super inefficient? I know they use it in th O&G industry to extract more O but this is just taking the piss.
minus-squareföderal umdrehen@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 months agoYeah, but you can run the liquefaction on solar, or better yet, excess fossil gas that you’d otherwise have to flare. On the other hand, how else is this supposed to work? Afaik, the stored CO2 is pressurized too.
How mich energy does that take (not the tranport, the liquefying). That HAS to be super inefficient?
I know they use it in th O&G industry to extract more O but this is just taking the piss.
Yeah, but you can run the liquefaction on solar, or better yet, excess fossil gas that you’d otherwise have to flare.
On the other hand, how else is this supposed to work? Afaik, the stored CO2 is pressurized too.