• Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t get why people are always so negative when a game is publicly developed for such a long time. It doesn’t really matter so long as the launch product is good.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      In this case that seems to be the crux of the issue. Star Citizen players pay top dollar for mediocre ingame content.

      People who take money are expected to deliver equivalent goods.

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        But it’s not been launched. It’s kind of like all the people that were bashing Skull & Bones or Rainbow Six Extraction before they even came out.

        Sure, now that they’re actually out you can say people were right but I also wonder how much of that is self fulfilling prophecy. If you literally kill the PR for a product/game, it’s really hard for any studio or company to come back from that.

        Nowhere has this studio said the game as it has been seen by players is “done” or the launch product.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          They took $669 Million USD and they’ve provided content and services for 11 years, people can and should expect returns befitting those numbers. Problem is, though, the team clearly hasn’t demonstrated the ability to make that sort of product.