• fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Dude. The 4th sentence of the page you linked says it doesn’t apply to this type of open ended question.

      The only possible answer to this (admittedly silly) headline is, “it depends what you mean by die”. An answer yes or no could easily be rebutted.

      • criitz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The adage does not apply to questions that are more open-ended than strict yes–no questions.

        But this is a strict yes-no question

        • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Did you not bother to read the 3rd and 4th sentence of my comment?

          The question is open ended. It’s subjective, dependent on the definition of “die”. It’s not answerable with merely yes or no.

    • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The headline is 6 words. The article is 3,606 words. Expressed as a percentage, the amount of content you have decided to address comes to a grand total of 0.16%.

      If you have no interest in interacting with the content, it would be simple enough to state that. But to dismiss the entirety of the article based on 0.16% of the content seems rather short sighted to me. Do you have any thoughts to share about the article?

      • onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nah, I’m allergic to clickbait. If it had a better, more serious title, I’d read it.

        If you’re the author of the article, you have to find that line between interesting and clickbait. Sensationalist titles like that are like smearing a distasteful substance on the cover of a book. No matter what you write in that book, I’m not picking it up.

        Possible titles (without even reading the article) that would make me click with an open mind

        • Threats to the open web
        • How much has the web changed since $date?
        • Where does the web go after $event?
        • The future of the web - an opinion
        • How do monopolies affect the internet?

        CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

        • fluffyb@lemmy.fluffyb.net
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          I would not have clicked if it had any of those titles. And I do actually agree with the title. We are watching the death of the internet. It will never be again what it was. And what it is now is a clean white washed drip fed version of the expansive and deep knowledge of everything that it once was.

        • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s more like it, this is a discussion that people can actually interact with! I am not the author, and I agree with you that the title isn’t great, but I am interested in discussing what they wrote and appreciate that you’ve now at least opened the door to a discussion on clickbait titles rather than just leaving a one sentence “gotcha”.