Apparently, stealing other people’s work to create product for money is now “fair use” as according to OpenAI because they are “innovating” (stealing). Yeah. Move fast and break things, huh?

“Because copyright today covers virtually every sort of human expression—including blogposts, photographs, forum posts, scraps of software code, and government documents—it would be impossible to train today’s leading AI models without using copyrighted materials,” wrote OpenAI in the House of Lords submission.

OpenAI claimed that the authors in that lawsuit “misconceive[d] the scope of copyright, failing to take into account the limitations and exceptions (including fair use) that properly leave room for innovations like the large language models now at the forefront of artificial intelligence.”

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    And yet it is orders of magnitude less than it cost a year ago to hire someone to do research, write reports, and tutor me in any subject I want.

    If an artist can’t afford $20/mo they need a job to support that hobby.

    • ParsnipWitch@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      You do realise that the models stole the art from people all over the world, yes? It’s not like someone in Indonesia drawing fan art can simply profit off their own work the way people like you now can.

      I also think this attitude (“just get a job to support your hobby while I get to profit of your work”) shows an overall lack of respect for artists.