• InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Its only big in the US, most of the planet only sees iMessage as that borderline useless app Apple bundles in their phones.

    • penquin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s annoying as fuck when I message my wife a video of our kids, it looks like dog shit on her iPhone. I have to instead send it on Whatsapp or signal. I hate apple

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s because you’re using SMS, that’s not the fault of the messaging app. Using a third party messaging app is the correct way to go, it’s encrypted, supports group chats, and bigger messages.

        • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          So does iMessage, to be fair. The problem is that Apple decided not build clients for alternative platforms, but the app itself is quite competent.

          Hopefully Apple can convince the telco people to implement E2EE in RCS (though good luck getting that through with wiretap laws all around the world, lol) so there’s some kind of cross-platform standard here. Apple is going to implement RCS to save Americans from blurry videos at the very least, but it won’t add Google’s proprietary encryption standard.

          • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Hopefully not RCS, but maybe Matrix or the Signal protocol, as RCS is entirely controlled by Google and there aren’t any FOSS clients.

            • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              RCS is controlled by GSMA, not Google. I’m sure they’ll welcome Google’s extensions, but Google doesn’t get to decide.

              Google can try to do the same thing they did to XMPP, but then they get the same “Androids don’t receive our pictures” problem that’s driving teenagers to buy iOS in the USA in the first place.

              • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Specification may be not controlled by Google, but the single available client implementation is controlled by Google and almost all carriers are delegating managing their RCS servers to Google.

                While XMPP or Matrix server you can host even on your LAN network between two computers.

                • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  With Apple controlling the majority of the lucrative American teenage user base (after all, if all you’ve ever used is iPhone, you’ll probably stick to iPhone in the future; this is what Adobe did, what Microsoft did, and what Google came in to take over, and both succeeded) and an ever growing percentage elsewhere, Apple implementing RCS would immediately sway control over the protocol back the other way.

                  My phone doesn’t come with XMPP or Matrix preinstalled. If I’m going to be talking to people, it’ll be through an app they already have (WhatsApp, in my case, maybe Telegram or Signal) or we’ll fall back to SMS if I barely have any signal. In a group of 30 tech enthusiasts, I’ve seen proposals to switch to Matrix succeed in convincing 5 of them to install a new app. With how inferior XMPP and Matrix apps still are today, I don’t think I’ll have much better luck with normal people.

                  I want either Matrix or XMPP to succeed, but at the way things are progressing, I just don’t see it happening.

                  • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Apple can implement RCS, but what then? Currently people not using Apple approved device in US can be marginalized. After RCS people not using Apple or Google approved device are going to be marginalized. And they both have wide requirements in order to be approved, recently Google started requiring Play Integrity check. So no RCS after you get rid of YouTube app for example.

                    This is the same discussion all over about defaults like if this was LibreOffice vs MS Office debate.