• sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I just said to someone yesterday on Mastodon that it seems as though they’re not using humans any more, because WTF is this shit?

      • Zworf@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It’s because a good translation is not (always) literal.

        In the German version it says taglich in hamburg. In English you would indeed put an adverb (like daily) at the end. It works the other way around but it’s not really what a native English speaker would say.

          • addie@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Absolutely this. I’d have argued that ‘every day’ is a more idiomatic translation than ‘daily’, and what native speakers would say, but that’s irrelevant. English tends to emphasise the end of sentences as the most important part, so all these translations are correct depending on the nuance that you intend:

            • Daily in Hamburg, many ships arrive (as opposed to eg. cars, or few ships)
            • Daily, many ships arrive in Hamburg / Many ships arrive daily in Hamburg (as opposed to eg. Bremen)
            • Many ships arrive in Hamburg daily (as opposed to eg. weekly)

            Wouldn’t question any of those constructions as a native speaker. In fact, original responders’ example was why I gave up on Duolingo myself originally, some years ago. Translating ‘future tense’ sentences from Spanish into English or back again is always going to be a matter of opinion, since English doesn’t have the verb conjugations that Spanish does. Guessing the ‘sanctified answer’ is tedious, when a lot of the time it’s not even the most natural form of a sentence.

    • sub_o@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, this is frustrating.

      I can handle absurd sentences like “The dog is cooking the dinner”, and actually finds them beneficial because it prevents me from guessing the whole sentence.

      But this is a sign that not enough human efforts are poured into create permutation of the answers.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Let me guess, the full sentence was: “Last night we ate the dog cooked for dinner”… /s

        • sub_o@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          nope, “The dog is cooking a dinner” is that kind of absurdist sentence that works. So that I just don’t guess a human on the subject position. Or ‘eating’ for the verb

    • The_Terrible_Humbaba@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      This is frustrating, but it has always been an issue; and usually the more you advance in a language tree the more it happens, because fewer people have found the problem and reported it. It’s a human problem that comes with not considering every possibility when creating an exercise. I’d imagine that using AI (in addition to humans) would actually help reduce cases like this, since they could be detected before users run into them.