• silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Here’s the thing: in almost all cases, it’s cheaper to not emit in the first place than to pay for carbon capture. So the economics of it actually matter quite a bit.

    • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, this is the sneaker. Unless they’re powering carbon capture with green energy or perpetual motion (spoiler alert), they’re basically burning a whole lot more carbon to claw back a little already emitted carbon.