• Minotaur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    This image is a pretty good example of AI art being pretty bad at doing what it should.

    Because this isn’t the style of H.R. Giger. Like… not at all. It’s black and white? It has… details? This is just 5 or so different “robot detective” pieces blended together and it turns into sludge.

    • yukichigai@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yep. It was not at all what I wanted or expected. And yet, I can’t deny that it looks good.

      Of course as I said elsewhere, this is DALL-E 3 via Bing, which has a very mixed track record to begin with. I wasn’t that surprised I didn’t get what I wanted.

      • Hyperreality@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I suspect it’s because a lot of the cyberpunk out there is explicitly neo-noir. So you end up with a noir detective mixed with a robot, like Nick Valentine in Fallout, even if the tubes and cables are slightly Gigerish. Not much Inspector Gadget, because that’s primarily a cartoon.

  • Thelsim@sh.itjust.worksM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I couldn’t help but give it a try myself :)


    Prompt: character design of inspector gadget, wearing a fedora, riddled with biomechanical implants, looking in horror at the viewer, as painted by H. R. Giger
    Yes, I know it was a trilby and not a fedora. I only found out after I made this image.

    It’s no Giger, but then again I really can’t see how you could blend the two styles without losing what made Giger’s work so unique.