• jarfil@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Only small services with fewer than 50 employees and annual turnover of under €10 million (around $10.8 million) are exempt.

    Soon: large platforms firing everyone but 49 employees, and outsourcing all their operations to hundreds of companies with fewer than 49 employees each… all owned by the same shareholders.

    • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Making sure their turnover also gets split into hundreds of companies seems like an administrative nightmare though. And I suspect the EU regulators are smart enough to see through such a ruse - eBay would still be one website, not hundreds, after all.

      • blindsight@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah, exactly. 10MM is peanuts to huge tech companies. It’s not reasonable to split up services in a way that would still be profitable.

        The Fediverse would likely be exempt, but any social media with advertising and any scale at all will hit 10MM revenue pretty quickly.

        • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, I think the fact that the Fediverse is genuinely and legitmately multiple small websites, each of which can be proven to be run by different people with no connection to each other, would mean it’s exempt.

          • DosDude👾@retrolemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Well, most are run by 1 person or a small team. None have profits. Some have donation pages, and that’s it. So they are exempt by definition.

      • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Just put the moderation business into a separate entity with no real revenue, which has no more than 49 regular employees and employ the rest as freelancers. Bam.

        • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          That would probably work in the US, but I’m not so sure it’d work in the EU. Even the UK is capable of cracking down on “freelancers” who are obviously just regular employees with bosses trying to dodge regulation.

    • Rimu@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      or they could just comply with the law:

      sites will have to provide a reason to users when their content or account has been moderated, and offer them a way of complaining and challenging the decision. There are also rules around giving users the ability to flag illegal goods and services found on a platform.

      Doesn’t seem like a big deal to me.

      • tuhriel@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It is at the scale they are working on, there’s a reason you can’t get an actual person to contact you… It’s too expensive to have actual people working these cases