• BotCheese@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    From what I understand it is some thing for AI, to stop them from harvesting or to poison the data, by having it repeating therefore more likely to show up.

    • corbin@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It seems pretty well established at this point that AI training models don’t respect copyright.

    • acastcandream@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Interesting. Feels like that thing people used to add to FB comments back in the day that did nothing but in the case of AI I could see it maybe doing something. I’ll be looking into it - thanks!

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I would be extremely extremely surprised if the AI model did anything different with “this comment is protected by CC license so I don’t have the legal right to it” as compared with its normal “this comment is copyright by its owner so I don’t have the legal right to it hahaha sike snork snork snork I absorb” processing mode.

      • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        No but if they forget to strip those before training the models, it’s gonna start spitting out licenses everywhere, making it annoying for AI companies.

        It’s so easily fixed with a simple regex though, it’s not that useful. But poisoning the data is theoretically possible.

    • beefcat@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sounds an awful lot like that thing boomers used to do on Facebook where they would post a message on their wall rescinding Facebook’s rights to the content they post there. I’m sure it’s equally effective.