• ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The thing is, we got here by not caring what will happen over time. We only care about what happens today.

    An engineer won’t be allowed to design a “future proof” building unless said design is cheaper than otherwise.

    A construction company won’t be allowed to use more sustainable materials, or construct in a better way, unless those materials and processes are cheaper than otherwise.

    One way to make those things cheaper than “otherwise” is tax. Carbon, energy, sustainability, whatever you want to call it.

    Though, passing such tax law doesn’t seem feasible to me, considering the ones that would have to write, foot, and vote to pass, said laws are the ones who would stand to “lose” profit due to said laws.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Or regulations have to change.
      Use taxes to make construction more environmentally friendly.
      Change regs to make sure buildings can survive increased rain, wind, heat and cold

    • S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Building codes need to be advanced to accommodate the changing environment. The Canadian building code was updated the other year with some real improvements.

      Couple that with some Federal incentives for things like heat pumps and it’s a start. Something to build upon, but private industry isn’t going to take the lead here. The public sector needs to force this down our throats, which is why all government projects around me need to be LEED certified.