• misterfenskers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I had a shower thought this morning:

    At a certain point in capitalism, a wealthy person can get enough money to live comfortably the rest of your life. If you decide to continue to grow your wealth from there, you’re essentially not just making money for yourself, but so others can’t have it.

    I have a feeling that number is well below a billion, but I’m no economist.

    • JasSmith@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you decide to continue to grow your wealth from there, you’re essentially not just making money for yourself, but so others can’t have it.

      This is a zero-sum fallacy. The size of the economy isn’t fixed. It continues to grow each year. The hyper productive people you’re referring to are disproportionately responsible for that growth, and they are disproportionately the recipients of that growth. My father was one of those people. Working 18 hours every day for 30 years. It led to a divorce and our family falling apart, but fuck did he generate a lot of economic value for the world, his company, and himself. He didn’t steal it from you. He created it.

      • brianary@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        While true, the growth of the economy has been wildly outpaced by the rate of hoarding at the top. After all that extra work, how much better off was your dad after everyone above him benefitted?