• TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    So which one really is it

    • dropping it for backlash
    • too expensive to be done
    • actually implementing it but keeping it shush for PR
    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      CEOs of companies that are adjacent to technology desperately want to ensure that their company isn’t seen as “outdated”, almost more than they want to actually not be outdated.

      So when a technology comes that everyone in tech leadership is saying is the bestest, they want to make sure everyone knows they’re totally with it, whatever the cool kids are talking about.

      Hype train goes chugga chugga.

      As the hype train slows, they still need to be onboard, but they set expectations based on what their people are actually telling them.

      So this is the CEO yelling to do something, and then the news slowly percolating back from the tech people that they can, but only a handful of projects can do so in a way that makes sense, has impact, and doesn’t disrupt a timeline or budget in a way that requires shareholder disclosure.