Sexually explicit AI-generated images of Taylor Swift have been circulating on X (formerly Twitter) over the last day in the latest example of the proliferation of AI-generated fake pornography and the challenge of stopping it from spreading.

X’s policies regarding synthetic and manipulated media and nonconsensual nudity both explicitly ban this kind of content from being hosted on the platform.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Unhealthy things should be forbidden? Even if they were, this is drifting off of the subject of AI art.

      • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Things that are bad for society should be suppressed and things which are good for society should be promoted. That would seem to be the point of a society.

        Further, I notice a pastern in your replies of bringing up metaphor then rejecting the very metaphor as off topic or irrelevant when it is engaged to it’s logical conclusion.

        No accusing you of engaging in bad faith or anything, but it smells (sorry, metaphor again) less-than-fresh.

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Things that are bad for society should be suppressed and things which are good for society should be promoted.

          Should we also have a single wise man to decide which is which? That has been tried before, multiple times.

          • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Should we also have a single wise man to decide which is which?

            Well we certainly shouldn’t have violence for violence, as is the Rule of Beasts.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          Things that are bad for society should be suppressed and things which are good for society should be promoted. That would seem to be the point of a society.

          Great, now we just need to establish whether AI art is “bad for society”, and if it is then whether the effects of attempting to ban it would be worse for society.

          Further, I notice a pastern in your replies of bringing up metaphor then rejecting the very metaphor as off topic or irrelevant when it is engaged to it’s logical conclusion.

          What metaphors did I bring up? You’re the one who brought fast food into this. I don’t see any other metaphors in play.

          • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Great, now we just need to establish whether AI art is “bad for society”

            That seems fairly evident

            You’re the one who brought fast food into this.

            You were fine engaging fastfood until I pointed out it, like AI " art " was terrible. Only then did you deride the metaphor as off topic.

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              That seems fairly evident

              Hardly. There wouldn’t be much debate about it if it was, would there?

              You were fine engaging fastfood until I pointed out it, like AI " art " was terrible. Only then did you deride the metaphor as off topic.

              Alright, in future I will try to remember to immediately reject any metaphors you bring into play rather than attempt to engage with them.

              • FfaerieOxide@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                There wouldn’t be much debate about it if it was, would there?

                Sure there can be. People debate crypto being good and that’s roundly recognized as ecocide. People “debate” who counts as people all the time. People can be wrong and loud.

                Alright, in future I will try to remember to immediately reject any metaphors you bring into play rather than attempt to engage with them.

                Not saying you have to do that, but if you don’t it’s rather untoward to bring it up later as though it’s a problem.

                • FaceDeer@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Ethereum switched to proof-of-stake a year and a half ago, it no longer has a significant environmental impact.

                  Oh wait, this is an analogy, isn’t it?