• t3rmit3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    As someone who used to really like Phil, I agree with this. He’s clearly banking on his popularity as a “celebrity” within the gaming community to put a smiling spin on what is a clearly horrible business record.

    The question here is not whether Microsoft does the same things that all businesses do (i.e. be evil Capitalist monstrosities that run people’s livelihoods over in the name of investor greed)- that much is obvious.

    The question is whether Phil Spencer is actively enabling this behavior and also covering for it- which he is.

    And that is why, as the article suggests, people need to stop treating him as anything other than a corporate representative who wants to extract as much value as he can before it all runs into the ground.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Idk, Kotaku isn’t exactly a good source for ethics in this industry. They list something that every single large game company does: buy studios, move talent around, close the old studios. They also talk about how he claims to champion preservation and emulation, something we all agree with.

    I vote he stays.

    • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I vote he stays.

      The article didn’t say he needs to go, they said people need to stop treating him as though he is actually on the side of consumers and employees, rather than investors.

      The literal last line of the article is

      I hope moving forward Xbox fans and the media hold Spencer more accountable for future mistakes, cuts, and failures.

    • dsemy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They list something that every single large game company does: buy studios, move talent around, close the old studios.

      Not every large game company acts this way. This is also not what he did at all - he didn’t restructure the studios after buying them, he closed them and laid off their employees.

      They also talk about how he claims to champion preservation and emulation, something we all agree with.

      He’s a known liar (just a year ago he claimed Arkane will continue to polish Redfall, now Arkane Austin has closed before giving people DLC they already paid for)

      Phil Spencer has been the head of Xbox for a decade, a decade where Xbox consistently got worse. The only smart decision they made this entire time is Game Pass IMO.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not every large game company acts this way.

        I’d like you to name a large game company that hasn’t done this, I’m not aware of a single one.

        This is also not what he did at all - he didn’t restructure the studios after buying them, he closed them and laid off their employees.

        Incorrect, employees are being moved to different studios. I’m unaware how many, if any, are being laid off. For example, Roundhouse is being assigned to Zenimax who run Elder Scrolls Online which is admittedly actually a pretty cool game.

        He’s a known liar (just a year ago he claimed Arkane will continue to polish Redfall, now Arkane Austin has closed before giving people DLC they already paid for)

        A corporate hack who is in touch with what gamers want is still better than some other out of touch corporate shill, as the state of gaming exemplifies every single day. On the subject of Redfall, it’s no surprise that studio got shut down after the incredible failures at launch, they clearly were never qualified to work on the title anyways, and that’s hardly Phil Spencer’s fault.

        Why are we quoting each other? I remember the comment before yours. I made it. Idiot.

        • Echinoderm@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Why are we quoting each other? I remember the comment before yours. I made it. Idiot.

          Because quoting in a response provides structure to the response that improves readability.

          Also, you are posting on a publicly accessible forum, not having a one-on-one conversation. In that context, that fact that you may remember what you said doesn’t mean that it’s not beneficial to repeat it for others.

          The “idiot” comment was unnecessarily rude where someone was engaging in what appeared to be a good faith response, and only brings down the tone of your entire post.

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            It feels like people do it so commonly while making such weak arguments that it might be a bot trying to parse the prior comment. Feels like it doesn’t have use in any other circuimstance.

            • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I know you’re banned, but for when you come back, there are several reasons.

              1. It let’s people make a response to specific parts of what you said.
              2. It helps outside folks see the train if thought
              3. For me personally, it helps organize ideas and see the comment response closer together