• Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      What’s the funny part? It’s literally globally known and had a great reputation among normies until the Great Chode Takeover

      • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s what I’m getting at. The site itself was pure poison, but the logo, the term “tweet” was literally genius.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Twitter was great and I think anyone who thinks otherwise either curated it to be awful or didn’t really use it at all. Your Twitter experience was defined by who you followed. There was sports Twitter, political Twitter, science Twitter, weird Twitter…there were thousands of different spheres to put yourself in.

          If you followed political accounts…yeah you set yourself up for a toxic experience. But I followed funny people so my experience was great. A seemingly endless series of one liners, comics, and weird observations.

          • fpslem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think anyone who thinks otherwise either curated it to be awful or didn’t really use it at all.

            . . . or was targeted by harassment campaigns that the company did a poor job of protecting against. Plenty of celebrities and political actors realized they could weaponize their fanbases to go after critics, and Twitter never did much to stop it. For public officials or organizations, twitter too often was a cesspool of abuse that they couldn’t afford to leave, and that was messed up. (I think the balance has shifted now, that they can afford to leave and have a moral obligation to do so, but many haven’t.)

            I always enjoyed my twitter experiences, because like you, I curated a nice feed to follow (and used a browser to keep on chronological timeline). But I was just a follower, mostly, and was never targeted by the really nasty stuff. But I’m not so myopic as to declare that what worked for me wasn’t awful for many other folks.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Twitter was no worse in that regard than any social media site until the 2016 election.

              • Strykker@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                2016 was 8 years ago, that means by your definition twitter spent nearly half it’s existence as a toxic cesspool