• someguy3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Probably not as much, but I expect Europe will still use winter peaking plants for a good while.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      In the context of a massive build-out of LNG export capacity, this implies a huge marketing effort by the fossil fuels industry to addict new users to it

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The US is planning to increase its current LNG capacity by 5x, it’s completely insane. The fossil fuel industry is too big and powerful for the government to have any chance to set any reasonable limits. Any talk of slightly slowing down LNG buildout is met with far-right hysteria.

        https://youtu.be/K2oL4SFwkkw

    • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sure, but LNG is more expensive then pipeline gas and Europe has some reserves in Norway and gas pipelines to Northern Africa, Central Asia and somewhat the Middle East. That means as soon as Russian gas supply becomes zero, the US LNG supply to Europe is going to decrease.

      There is also a lot of gas storage in the EU, which is meant mainly to work for the seasonal demand changes coming from heating with gas. Since wind is stronger in the North Sea region in winter, that means besides some non windy days, peaker plants will be used less and less. Grid sized battery storage and better grids are really being deployed relativly quickly, so that should fall as well. The big question is how quickly gas consumption is going to decline as most European countries focus more on shutting down coal power plants.